Effective microorganisms
published: 19/05/18, 18:40
Someone can tell me what mean effective microorganisms = EM
Company solutions for ecology and economy. Politics, technologies, innovations, clean energy, home and work, DIY and self-construction, repairing a breakdown, health, bitcoins and alternative finance
https://www.econologie.com/forums/
https://www.econologie.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=15663
Effective microorganisms (EM) showed no effect on crop yields in a four-year field experiment. ▶ EM showed no effect on soil microbial parameters characterizing biomass, structure and activity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 9310001332
Because the few scientific studies show that it only works with the name.Janic wrote:Should we draw the conclusion that it is a fool's trade?
Here, as for other studies, EM-bokashi is discussed, hence organic matter, whose effects on the soil are known and can not be attributed to EM's alone.Soil respiration increased one week after soil amendment with EM-bokashi and EM-bokashi sterilized compared to control, but not seven weeks later. DGGE showed that two batches of EM products had different microbial communities and that soil amendment with EM-bokashi or sterilized EM-bokashi did not change the bacterial community and diversity in two soils. The microorganisms added in EM were probably overcomposed and did not affect the existing bacterial community. We conclude that EM has not consistently suppressed soil-borne diseases or modified microbial activity and bacterial composition and diversity. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 9417301485
So you're a specialist? So educate us!Your definition of vaccination is wrong and is not the subject.
So you would deny evolution? Welcome then! You should revise a little biology where the notion of being evolved is hardly mentioned any more than by some lagging fanatics. A bacterium is as complex as any other form of life and it is these bacteria that represent the largest population in number and weight on this earth.These are your analogies that are false.
The immune system, understood to be an evolved being, is not like the ecosystem of a soil or a compost.
You are "right" indeed,concerning everything that is kept secret. However, you then question all patented scientific work "and therefore secret, secret and empiricism are not synonyms since all patents on living things are supposed to be high level and yet incommunicable, even to the highest authorities of the States. Inquire before any rough statement.The EM's are a set of μorgs supposedly selected, but whose composition is secret so empirical,
you have learned your lesson well! Bravo![*]while for an effective vaccine, the goal is to make the immune system react so that it recognizes and eliminates itself a pathogenic aggressor.
Always in ignorance! the reputation on the effectiveness of vaccines, since Pasteur, was not made on ultra-selected proteins (which could be the effectiveness could be recognized as more reliable than to take pus on animals to inject them to humans )The composition may be a virus or bacterium whose pathogenic effect has been deactivated or very attenuated, but more and more it is only a protein and nothing of living that is injected, so as to bring the minimum of risk and the maximum of benefit to the patient.
Always this contempt for everything that does not come from your pseudo scientific sources. On the one hand you confuse antitheft and precaution vis-à-vis dangerous products! And why ? The entire medical profession is not unanimous and therefore very high-level scientists (but not dependent on vaccine manufacturers) warn about the invasive vaccinology that mainly protects these industries and guarantees them total impunity as in America.What do not want to understand antivacs that prefer risk to profit.
Like the subject you initiated on a menasseong statement.You have other topics to pour out your conspiracy theses, stick to you please
Effective Microorganisms ® (EM) is a microbial inoculant designed to stimulate plant growth and soil fertility in agriculture. In this study, we investigated the effects of SE on crop yields and soil microbial parameters in a four-year, biologically managed field experiment (2003-2006) in Zurich, Switzerland. ...
▶ Effective micro-organisms (ME) showed no effect on crop yields in a field experiment of 4 years.
▶ The SE showed no effect on soil microbial parameters characterizing biomass, structure and activity.
▶ Observed effects of EM preparations may be related to nutrient loading by EM carrier substrates.
▶ The ecological impact of the SE on soil quality was low, while the effects of sampling time exceeded the effects on the MOE.
Bokashi, as he has come to mean (...), is not a composting process. At all. It does not compost, but converts materials that can not be composted, because they will rancid or attract the critters into something that you can bury and ignore, and they also produce a nutritious plant food.
But the magic "effective micro-organisms" that you would like the sales talk to bring you are, in my opinion, rather misleading.
The best results I got were taking a new load (a small amount of a kitchen composter pot) of mixed kitchen waste, mixing a tablespoon of glucose from a food store Natural and Lactobacillus bacteria powder, the type you get in a health food store (and that a homemade salami maker may have hidden in the fridge!). Mix, put in a well-sealed plastic container (a Bokashi composter) with a tap at the bottom and leave for three weeks.
When it works (which has been the case twice before), you get a bacterial de-proteinase removal. Or, in other words, Lactobacillus bacteria became nuts, ate glucose, and then went for more treats. The pH has dropped to such an extent that much of the protein has been lysed in food waste and remains in the liquid (draw it as a plant food, you have to dilute it a lot), and the solid matter just feels a little unpleasantly sweet. Bury the garbage in a corner of the lot and ignore them. It will rot, and the worms will eat it.
When it does not work, it's horrible and you need a strong stomach to deal with it.
The use of the "sound" of bokashi was no more or less effective than a spoonful of bacteria and glucose powder.
I therefore conclude that the process (at least with the waste we produce!) Is very similar to silage.