the Quasiturbine

Tips, advice and tips to lower your consumption, processes or inventions as unconventional engines: the Stirling engine, for example. Patents improving combustion: water injection plasma treatment, ionization of the fuel or oxidizer.
Bibiphoque
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 749
Registration: 31/03/04, 07:37
Location: Brussels

the Quasiturbine




by Bibiphoque » 02/12/04, 14:25

:P
Hi, here's the link:
http://www.quasiturbine.com

He is full of other ideas too !!
A + B)
0 x
This is not because we always said that it is impossible that we should not try :)
User avatar
simplino
I understand econologic
I understand econologic
posts: 143
Registration: 22/11/15, 18:28




by simplino » 22/12/15, 19:40

This one still exists and holds the road :
http://quasiturbine.promci.qc.ca/

and deserves to be used.


Image

Image

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Quasiturbine

Among an innumerable collection of dreamers even crazy, like this one:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory: ... _Mechanism
.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79121
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10973




by Christophe » 22/12/15, 23:14

0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 26/12/15, 09:04

How many moving parts!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 26/12/15, 11:27

the quasi turbine can not work effectively in terms of kinematics and therefore effective. Its limitation to the tire, by not taking into account the leaks related to the lack of tightness, the lubrication make that from its beginning the quasiturbine has never been used in thermal. This is another flop, despite the technical and intellectual interest that this represents.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
chatelot16
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6960
Registration: 11/11/07, 17:33
Location: Angouleme
x 264




by chatelot16 » 27/12/15, 10:34

it's really the principle why make it simple when you can do complicated!

how to have a seal with all these joints

if you really want a rotary engine there is the wankel engine with a rigid piston in one piece, much simpler

but to make a powerful heat engine requires a combustion chamber as compact as possible to not lose heat by the wall: the conventional cylinder is close to the optimum ... the chamber of the wankel has surface too, loses too much heat, and gives a poor performance ... the quasi turbine will be worse

in air compressor it is the opposite: it is desirable to dissipate heat during compression, so the large surface of the rotating system becomes an advantage .... but there is other rotary compressor easier to manufacture than this quasi turbine which I do not see the interest
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491




by Janic » 27/12/15, 10:54

chatelot hello
but to make a powerful heat engine requires a combustion chamber as compact as possible to not lose heat by the wall: the conventional cylinder is close to the optimum ...
Not really! its main advantage (in nine) is to have a better sealing than the other systems usually proposed. Not insignificant advantage when the compression increases and the quasiturbine is utopian in that sense.

the wankel chamber has surfaced too much, loses too much heat, and gives poor performance

Here again it is not really the case. Indeed it is the active surface of the piston that determines the power of thrust and therefore of heat loss. We must therefore compare wankel or traditional pistons of the same active surface. On the other hand the classic piston sees increase the surface of heat loss in descending it is therefore the lateral surfaces that must be compared and the difference must not be major, to see the advantage of wankel and quasi. Who wants to calculate it?
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Special motors, patents, fuel consumption reduction"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 212 guests