Important for new visitors, note by Christophe at 14 July 2007. (last edition Capt_Maloche 11 / 05 / 2010)
After more than 2 years of testing (back and forth), the use of MPG Caps did not never been probative, worse, in many cases, consumption increased ... and for good reason: most of our tests were conducted on gasoline vehicles, and recently on recent INNsCapt_Maloche wrote:Special thanks Nialabert for the latest analyzes
THIS PRODUCT IS AN ADDITIVE KNOWN BY THE NAME OF FERROCENE, DISCOVERED IN 1951, WITH NON-DURABLE "REMETALIZING" PROPERTIES AND ANTI-EXPLOSION;
ON THE DOSES EMPLOYED, IT MODIFIED THAT VERY LITTLE COMBUSTION
This product was used in the 60 / 70 years as a fuel additive to replace leaded gasoline.
FERROCENE is suspected by the AICS of being:
- an endocrine toxic
- A gastrointestinal toxic and liver
Its technical interest lies in the fact that a deposit of iron is renewed continuously in the cylinder chamber, and that it allows for diesel vehicles only equipped with particle filters, better destroy the soot deposits.
The concern is that this iron deposit will disrupt the ignition of vehicles spark plugs (short circuits of the electrodes)
The dosage of this product depends solely on the internal state of the engine; the farther the engine is, the better it works. The more the particle filter is clogged, the more it opens ... this last action can be advantageously achieved by pushing the engine a bit in high revs to over-activate the catalytic converters and FAP.
The maximum dosage allowed to date (to be verified) is 30 ppm, ie 0,21 grams for 10l of fuel.
If this metallic additive is added in "large" quantity, it will be found in the exhaust in the form of small particles of easily breathable metal oxides ...
Some of our current fuels contain non-ferrous equivalent as an additive. Glycerine allows an equivalent action, while being more ecological.
For gasoline vehicles, the same benefit can be obtained with a conventional remineraliser to be poured into the engine oil, without the worry of ignition.
THIS PRODUCT MAY BE EMPLOYED ONLY FOR DIESEL ENGINES, FOR A PUNCTUAL ACTION OF DECRASSAGE. BEYOND THIS USE, ITS ACTION IS INEFFECTIVE.
ACCORDING TO THE ALLOYS USED BY MANUFACTURERS, THE IRON DEPOSIT CAN OXIDE THE INTERIOR OF THE ENGINES.
WE FIND BETTER FOR LESS EXPENSIVE:
A REMETTALIZER IN OIL AT EACH DRAIN AND 6% SP95 ESSENCE IN GASOIL see here : Diesel-car-eat-less-with-a-little-of-sp95-t5849.html
Result of tests on 25 full !! : Independent testing-des-caps mpg-caps-of-ffi-t2778-600.html
See details HERE post55655.html # 55655
LATEST 2010 TESTS ON DCI DIESEL VEHICLE RECENT HERE: post164005.html # 164005
In addition the system of resale by step is doubtful, the few testimonials in favor of the product come most often from the salesmen themselves.
All these statements are explained in more detail in the 54 pages of this topic. + 54 today !!
Good reading.
I registered for the test program of the famous MPG capsules on the web at the following address:
christophe wrote:Here they are looking for testers:code: Select all
http://www.xxx-modération-xxx.fr/FFI
and it did not drag, which is a good sign
I received free 4 capsules:
Well, well I'll complete the full of my space, shaven mouth as usual. and I'm going to pray that it will not shoot anything
I would feel less alone if some econologists did the same, with tests objectives: . after all, you have to try to get a fair opinion.
I will do the test on my 2.00 l 16v 140Cv 95 000km
Current consumption approx. 9l / 100 mixed routes (rather traffic jams at the moment in Paris )
I plan a return trip to Bordeaux for Christmas, it should be enough to get an idea ...
See you soon