Anyway, I find their site interesting in explanations (the approach is different from the classic approaches) of which here are the most relevant extracts:
A) The actors (we are part of it): http://crbatiment.fr/controverse/acteur.html
As you can see, the cartography is centered on the fuel for a better comparison with water and gasoline or other.
For the scale with the position of the actors, they must be taken into account with water as fuel.
Users:
We find among the actors for, the users. The use of water in the engines would make it possible to buy less gasoline and that would be cheaper for the user. In addition, the population could travel more without polluting more.
It can now be said that automobile pollution is partly responsible for global warming. Consequently, the use of such an engine would significantly reduce CO2 production.
So the use of such a system has two positive sides for users, they will spend less money on gasoline and pollute less.
Associations / environmentalists:
Environmentalists and associations are actors favorable to this system because it would significantly reduce fuel consumption and therefore the release of CO2.
In a way, this engine would be the invention of the century, and part of the carbon dioxide problems would be re-absorbed.
The insurance:
Insurance is one of the main players because it is they who insure our vehicles and who allow users to use them.
However, they do not speak out due to the lack of scientific studies or serious tests carried out and validated by the Government.
They have no references on which to rely and therefore do not give their opinion.
The government:
We will focus on the consequences of the establishment of such a system for the Government. It would be a colossal loss of money because the consumption of gasoline would decrease very strongly while knowing that the state touches the VAT as well as the TIPP internal tax on petroleum products above.
In addition, the Government should modify all the structures for the establishment of the system.
Therefore, the Government does not speak out because they do not want to promote such an idea. So the Government is one of the actors against.
The oil groups:
Another very important player who does not wish to see such a system appear on the market is the oil lobbies. They are the ones who exert the most pressure because it would be a whole market that would drop sharply. All the OPEC countries would lose a lot of money because some of these countries are only selling oil.
Certain OPEC countries have already invested in renewable energies such as solar, wind ...
There are rumors that the oil companies are buying the patents to stifle this invention.
He is one of the most virulent actors against.
Car manufacturers:
Another player against are the automakers. Indeed, they do not have as the assurances of scientific studies carried out which would affirm that the engine functions. In addition, automobile groups have already invested huge sums of money in various alternative gasoline systems such as hydrogen or electricity.
They would have to invest again in this system when no study proves its effectiveness because the reaction will be contrary to the principle of energy conservation In addition, the implementation of the system would be very difficult because there would be difficulties in industrializing its manufacture.
Therefore, the builders are shy and do nothing.
B) The reverse: https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... jn64uM.pdf
Extract:
In this controversy we will try to unravel the mystery:
"Why doesn't the efficient yet achievable water engine break through in our means of transport?"
The current situation is ideal for launching such a project because we are at a turning point in the automotive world, and more precisely in the choice of a next fuel.
The car manufacturers are preparing for this change and are betting on a technology in its research. However, none of these large groups rely on the water engine, which however can prove its reliability, as proven by part of the automobile fleet of the town hall of Vitry sur Orne, which has been operating without problems since 2007.
Their site: http://moteur-a-eau.new.fr/