100% with water ??

Water injection in thermal engines and the famous "pantone engine". General informations. Press clippings and videos. Understanding and scientific explanations on the injection of water into engines: ideas for assemblies, studies, physico-chemical analyzes.
Icing
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 27/10/05, 23:53




by Icing » 28/10/05, 00:34

Why not use high efficiency electrolysis?
That is to say to send a frequency in the electrodes to the frequency of resonance of water which produces much more gas than with an electrolysis with direct current with the same amount of energy.
0 x
professeur_tournesol
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 2
Registration: 23/01/05, 10:55




by professeur_tournesol » 28/10/05, 08:39

For me, as a thermodynamicist, the answer is very clear: perpetual motion does not exist!
water is not a fuel but only plays the role of energy transfer. To decompose the water molecule, you need energy, which it will give back by recomposing. but the yield is never equal to one.
So the strictly water engine is not theoretically possible.

Professor_tournesol
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6




by Cuicui » 28/10/05, 09:53

It can work if we find a way to extract energy somewhere.
0 x
Icing
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 27/10/05, 23:53




by Icing » 28/10/05, 11:04

For me, as a thermodynamicist, the answer is very clear: perpetual motion does not exist!
water is not a fuel but only plays the role of energy transfer. To decompose the water molecule, you need energy, which it will give back by recomposing. but the yield is never equal to one.
So the strictly water engine is not theoretically possible.

Professor_tournesol

I agree with you, but an engine whose efficiency is 35-40% can surely be improved.
0 x
User avatar
professeur31
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 113
Registration: 20/12/04, 20:28




by professeur31 » 28/10/05, 11:28

prof_tournesol wrote:For me, as a thermodynamicist, the answer is very clear: perpetual motion does not exist!
water is not a fuel but only plays the role of energy transfer. To decompose the water molecule, you need energy, which it will give back by recomposing. but the yield is never equal to one.
So the strictly water engine is not theoretically possible.

Professor_tournesol

Totally agree with you prof.
Indeed the 100% water engine will never exist!
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79126
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10974




by Christophe » 28/10/05, 15:22

Professor31 wrote:Totally agree with you prof.
Indeed the 100% water engine will never exist!

And the flying saucers, huh? Isn't that a "proof" of the possible excess? :D :D
0 x
Icing
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 27/10/05, 23:53




by Icing » 28/10/05, 18:12

Why can't we make an engine with an efficiency of 99,99999999%? It's not 100% so it must be possible ...
0 x
User avatar
zac
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 1446
Registration: 06/05/05, 20:31
Location: piton st leu
x 2




by zac » 28/10/05, 18:44

Hello
past 20pm the day after RMI there are flying saucers and other flying objects in the bistros, but I'm not sure if this is the surunity !!!! :P (ptétre the rum, it will be necessary to dig into the subject);)
@+
zac
0 x
Said the zebra, freeman (endangered breed)
This is not because I am con I try not to do smart things.
quick
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 12
Registration: 09/06/05, 22:57
Location: 97290 Marin Martinique




by quick » 11/11/05, 00:18

In summary, the power required if we run an additional alternator to produce hydrogen by electrolysis cannot be recovered by the explosion of this hydrogen in the engine which turns this alternator?
true or false?
0 x
Other
Pantone engine Researcher
Pantone engine Researcher
posts: 3787
Registration: 17/03/05, 02:35
x 12




by Other » 11/11/05, 15:25

Hello
reply to quick
Currently the yield to decompose water is mediocre, the pulsed system improves the yield, but it is very, very far from a 100%. This system is exploited for the rapid recharging of certain batteries.
Qand the heat engine when we reach a yield of more than 30% c, is already beautiful,
So even with 95% efficiency in the decomposition of water and 80% efficiency in the engine, it could not work.
In other words it would mean a perpetual movement, because the water recovering from combustion could reserve once condensed,
we have the right to dream, we can at most boost an engine with decomposed gas and slightly improve the overall performance of the engine
I think it is more profitable to work on the combustion of the engine, to try to increase this mediocre efficiency by 30%
Andre
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 135 guests