Here is Rémi Guillet's latest book on wet combustion, published by Cambridge editions please!
In .pdf
Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79361
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?
Has he produced a proof of concept?
0 x
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Lost! his enemy brother (for those who remember this couple of actors) who stuck to it. It is not better, but in the absence of blackbird we are content with thrush until the specialist in everything on everything starts.Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Janic wrote:Lost! his enemy brother (for those who remember this couple of actors) who stuck to it. It is not better, but in the absence of blackbird we are content with thrush until the specialist in everything on everything starts.Izy is going to pretend this is rubbish again with a well-felt "but of course".
Still waiting for the effects of the candle that you put in Saint-Antoine to regain your senses?
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79361
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Exnihiloest wrote:I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?
No echo? Among YOUR technical circles and YOUR scientific circles perhaps? Apparently there are backgrounds more ignorant than others ... It is true that we still teach future heating engineers that a good oil flame is a yellow flame ... while we have known how to make blue oil flame for 15-20 years, bullshit and ignorance it can be treated but you have to want it!
If you had read earlier in this topic you would have found the following info, it's just on the previous page: understanding water-injection / combustion-wet-explanations-by-remi-guillet-t5794-40.html
a) A publication in engineering techniques (where econologie.com is cited as a reference ...): https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/bas ... 10005.html
b) Its work is at the base of the PAVE boiler (water vapor pump): inventions, innovations / boiler-CSTC-pave-pump-a-steam-and-water-t14245.html
Sorry but here, we are much further than the simple proof of concept... even the Chinese use it: https://www.econologie.com/combustion-h ... -nox-smog/
But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Christophe wrote:But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!
Relying on his outdated studies, the fatuity of this branque is limitless.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
GuyGadebois wrote:Christophe wrote:But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!
Relying on his outdated studies, the fatuity of this branque is limitless.
Still nervous pees? You have to consult.
0 x
- Exnihiloest
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5365
- Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
- x 660
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Christophe wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:I do not know if this Rémi Guillet has good ideas, but he has no echo in technical or scientific circles, apart from the publishers.
Has he produced a proof of concept?
No echo? Among YOUR technical circles and YOUR scientific circles perhaps? Apparently there are backgrounds more ignorant than others ... It is true that we still teach future heating engineers that a good oil flame is a yellow flame ... while we have known how to make blue oil flame for 15-20 years, bullshit and ignorance it can be treated but you have to want it!
If you had read earlier in this topic you would have found the following info, it's just on the previous page: understanding water-injection / combustion-wet-explanations-by-remi-guillet-t5794-40.html
a) A publication in engineering techniques (where econologie.com is cited as a reference ...): https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/bas ... 10005.html
b) Its work is at the base of the PAVE boiler (water vapor pump): inventions, innovations / boiler-CSTC-pave-pump-a-steam-and-water-t14245.html
Sorry but here, we are much further than the simple proof of concept... even the Chinese use it: https://www.econologie.com/combustion-h ... -nox-smog/
But you, behind your keyboard, YOU know ... oh poor you!
You answered about the proof of concept, thank you, indeed an achievement goes beyond.
But you seem to ignore what SEO is. For a scientist or engineer, it is the number of times his studies are cited or taken up by others. On this point, I maintain that its referencing is marginal. R Guillet looks very French-French to me.
That said, that doesn't mean that he wouldn't have a good idea, and that's why I asked the question, without thinking that it would provoke susceptibility reactions.
I wanted to know more. You say there is a 1923 patent on the matter. I can't find it on Espacenet, or if it is, which one is it? in the list ?). The basic idea would be old, is it the principle of Guillet's process? If an idea from 1923 did not make a splash, there may be good reasons which would still be valid and would also explain the confidentiality of the process on a global scale. Or Rémi Guillet may not have released his process until recently, and success will come. I have no clear-cut idea, I am only wary by experience, both of the "brilliant" ideas that emerge nearly a century later, as of the "cocorico" ideas which remain France.
0 x
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: Wet combustion: explanations by Rémi Guillet
Exnihiloest wrote:If an idea of 1923 did not take root, there may be good reasons which would still be valid and would also explain the confidentiality of the process on a world scale.
Yes, the "lack of interest" on the part of the oil industry at the time to validate and allow the commercialization of processes aimed at saving what was their business, their influence being able to "make" and "undo" the most valid patents.
0 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 14 Replies
- 37345 views
-
Last message by chatelot16
View the latest post
27/01/14, 13:47A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations
-
- 18 Replies
- 36678 views
-
Last message by bob_isat
View the latest post
20/03/06, 16:44A subject posted in the forum : Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations
Go back to "Water injection in heat engines: information and explanations"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 216 guests