Pesticides: standard agriculture cohabitation - dwellings

Discussion of methods of remediation and control air quality.
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by humus » 19/09/21, 10:17

izentrop wrote:A new international study concludes that overall, farmers have fewer cancers than the general population.

Need we remember that he is the “star” of activism and legal piracy against glyphosate and Bayer / Monsanto?
“The meta-SIR for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was less than 1,0 in males and females combined (n = 5; meta-RIS = 0,92, 95% CI = 0,86-0,98, 2, I0 = XNUMX%). There too less than the general population ...

The activists will have to revise your judgment : Wink:
5. conclusions
This analysis of eight AGRICOH cohorts provides insight into cancer incidence trends among agricultural workers, suggesting a lower incidence of cancer overall, including cancers of the bladder, breast (female), colorectum , esophagus, larynx, lung and pancreas and a higher incidence of prostate cancer in men and multiple myeloma and melanoma of the skin in women compared to the general population. Despite the large variations in geographic locations and farming practices, the results were largely consistent across cohorts, with some variation, suggesting the presence of some common underlying risk or protective factors among farm workers, men and women. women. ..
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a ... 5?via=ihub


A question like that, why the residents, the doctors and the scientists of the documentary would lie?
Another question why manufacturers would not lie omission?
You have 2 hours, although a second is enough.
1 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by humus » 19/09/21, 11:56

humus wrote:
A question like that, why the residents, the doctors and the scientists of the documentary would lie?
Another question why manufacturers would not lie omission?
You have 2 hours, although a second is enough.

..."Par"omission ... : Oops:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by Christophe » 19/09/21, 12:38

I propose...THE MONEY !

I have good Professor? : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
1 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 19/09/21, 13:27

humus wrote: : Arrow: Proof that you haven't watched the RTS documentary.
there is the solution to glyphosate-free and labor-free.

Izy does not read the studies, does not watch the documentaries that he posts himself and of which he only retains the title (here) which "seems" dependent. Caught in the act, once again, manifest fraud! But the:
Image
Go hide, Izy!
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by humus » 19/09/21, 15:59

Christophe wrote:I propose...THE MONEY !

I have good Professor? : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:

The walkthrough must have leaked : Wink:
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by humus » 19/09/21, 16:01

In the same register "dough" and "omission", one the phosphate vs cadmium, this evening on France 5.
It all becomes unbearable.
https://www.france.tv/france-5/vert-de- ... udits.html
0 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by izentrop » 19/09/21, 16:24

humus wrote:
humus wrote:
A question like that, why the residents, the doctors and the scientists of the documentary would lie?
Another question why manufacturers would not lie omission?
You have 2 hours, although a second is enough.

..."Par"omission ... : Oops:
You could re-edit your first post.

All this is only a political balance of power. The neo-murals having become the majority in the municipalities, it is they who make the law now.
They are lobotomized by activists who make them take risks for dangers and they swallow, that's all.
They will be happy when France depends entirely on foreigners for its food and sources of energy. : Twisted:

The solution proposed in the document is to replace glyphosate by tillage, therefore more oil consumption and more greenhouse gases emitted, therefore contrary to the fight against RC.
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 19/09/21, 16:33

izentrop wrote: All this is only a political balance of power. The neo-murals having become the majority in the municipalities, it is they who make the law now.
They are lobotomized by activists who make them take risks for dangers and they swallow, that's all.
They will be happy when France depends entirely on foreigners for its food and sources of energy. : Twisted:

The solution proposed in the document is to replace glyphosate by tillage, therefore more oil consumption and more greenhouse gases emitted, therefore contrary to the fight against RC.

It was a message from Chasse Pèche et Tradition, associated with the FNSEA and the chemical industry that Izy thanks for their messages as relevant as they carry a bright future ... : roll:
1 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by izentrop » 19/09/21, 16:48

My pov guitou the anthroposopher on duty.

The worst part is when governments take conspiracy rumors for real and make deadly decisions ...
“All the political ideologies which wanted to modify the peasant world have failed because the agricultural world cannot be managed by theories, it is governed by reality. "

Instead of eating non-toxic foods, Sri Lankans have a state of food emergency and a shortage of essentials.
"In Sri Lanka, the organic farming revolution is jeopardizing its tea industry." Because the whole agricultural sector is affected, not just tea and other export products like cinnamon.

In short, the disaster is largely the result of a very questionable decision, taken by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa by a Cabinet Memorandum of April 27, 2021, to ban imports of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides to promote 100% agriculture. % biological.

Controversies over fertilizers and pesticides are not new in Sri Lanka.

Thus, glyphosate has been accused of being at the origin of an epidemic of chronic kidney disease "of unknown origin" - it remains of unknown origin to the World Health Organization (WHO). The great promoter of this thesis, published in an article from February 2014, the title of which ends carefully with a question mark (of course obscured by anti-pesticide and anti-GMO activism), is Mr. Channa Jayasumana. He was a "witness" in the masquerade of the "International Monsanto Tribunal" of October 2016. He became Minister (Secretary) of State for Pharmaceutical Production, Supply and Regulation in 2020 and was Minister of Interim Health between February and August 2021 ... https://www.contrepoints.org/2021/09/11 ... limentaire
This is also ecology Image
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4302

Re: Pesticides: cohabitation standard agriculture - dwellings




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 19/09/21, 17:04

IzyLeClown.JPG
IzyLeClown.JPG (50.6 KB) Viewed 684 times

Ah yes, I forgot, the WHO, the biggest purveyor of false information and the friend of the industrialists, thank you for your judicious reminder above.
2 x

Back to "Air Pollution and solutions against air pollution"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 50 guests