Fully responsible! the return!

[the middle]

Speaking of Total: Renault Vesta 2: the economic concept because of 80 years within 2L / 100km but never sold!

Oh no it was Renault Elf he prefers forgiveness! but ultimately

Chrsistophe, I see that my message has gone wrong with you, even if the MAIN GOAL OF TOTAL is to earn A MAXIMUM OF MONEY.
It's hard to look in the mirror .... the truth hurts.
One last detail which is for and against TOTAL, they hate being noticed the wrong way ...
So Total does everything to please the populasse, so ecology interests TOTAL ... just to gain in sales.
Total will do nothing (for the moment, for the sake of humanity) it's the same for all large companies!)
I am aware of it ...; I do not in any way defend Total, but I warn you that YOU MAKE TOTAL LIVE (and the other oil companies)
Anyway, WE ARE prisoners of the SYSTEM .....
AND a SAGE solution must be found ... If there is one ....

[the middle]

Which is a shame,
This is because a site like econology only evolves ONLY people who read or participate in econology.
There are all the people who should "change" thinking "; those there are not participating; and the debate is important ...
But it takes necks ....., to express yourself ...
I believe most people don't want to "KNOW"
It's simpler .... so most people "VOTE", so they can watch TV wisely on Saturday nights ...

[Christophe]

Pkoi gone wrong? You are not a lobbyist as far as I know and have to eat well.

I have a friend who for 6 years in Reichstett it is not for that that I cause him more ...

Do not take this cabal for Total for personal ...

[the middle]

okay chris.

[Christophe]

I would add that anyway if it is not you who does this job it is another then pkoi blame you?

I am aware of it ...; I do not in any way defend Total, but I warn you that YOU MAKE TOTAL LIVE (and the other oil companies)

Right, but some people far more than others... For example: with Christine we do less than 10km (all inclusive) per year with a single car for 000 which consumes between 2 and 4,5L / 5 or 100L max of "oil" per year for 500 people. Fairly reasonable, isn't it? And to think about it we are closer to 2km ...

At home: 0 fuel oil since solar + wood.

And if I don't confuse you heat yourself with wood yourself, right?

People also forget that governments earn much more than oil tankers. Moreover clever government dares to accuse tankers of making too much and proposes to overtax them when they could just raise excise and energy taxes ...A height of intellectual dishonesty ...

I even wrote a news to "defend" Total on this one: https://www.econologie.com/petrole-non-a ... -3690.html

[Christophe]

Pollution from the Loire estuary forces La Baule to close its beach LEMONDE.FR with AFP | 29.03.08/10/26 | 29.03.08:10 am • Updated on 26/XNUMX/XNUMX | XNUMX:XNUMX am

The town of La Baule announced, Friday, March 28, the temporary closure of its beach after the discovery of a few pellets of oil following the pollution of the Loire estuary on March 16.

The seaside resort of Loire-Atlantique follows the neighboring town of Pornichet, which closed its beaches on Wednesday while cleaning them up with oil pellets.

The municipality of La Baule also announced that it had filed a complaint against this pollution, as did most of the affected municipalities.

Suite and source: http://www.lemonde.fr/sciences-et-envir ... _3244.html

[Arthur_64]

It is good that local authorities / corporations / etc. are increasingly systematically brought to justice in these cases. It only remains to hope that the courts will grant sufficient reparations and fines so that it is no longer profitable to pollute in this way.