Fusion, unlimited energy, return of the 30 glorious without GHGs

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14911
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4338

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 05/01/22, 19:31

Ahmed wrote:This is not a reproach that I addressed to you, but a simple wink. To insist in this way is a rhetorical figure of speech and not a mistake.

In my great magnanimity, I grant you my plenary indulgence this time, but that I do not take you back! : Wink:
1 x
Ahmed
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12306
Registration: 25/02/08, 18:54
Location: Burgundy
x 2967

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by Ahmed » 05/01/22, 19:41

Thanks thanks! : Oops: : Oops: : Oops:
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by humus » 06/01/22, 00:18

Ahmed wrote:This is not a reproach that I addressed to you, but a simple wink. To insist in this way is a rhetorical figure of speech and not a mistake.

Okay, that's fine this time! : Lol:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79294
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return of the 30 glorious without GHG




by Christophe » 06/01/22, 15:10

17 minutes of controlled fusion for the Chinese:



How many milliseconds in the MIT cocotes? : Lol: : Lol: : Lol: : Lol:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79294
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 11028

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by Christophe » 06/01/22, 15:13

humus wrote:Not what we call a publication but it is already that
To give an idea: a traditional copper magnet requires around 200 million Watts to confine the plasma, while the one developed by MIT requires only 30 Watts.

https://siecledigital.fr/2021/09/14/fus ... consommee/


or even
https://www.futura-sciences.com/science ... tee-59320/


Sorry, it's just pseudo-scientific start-up blah without any technical details (maybe a patent?) ... It's at the level of the pfizer press service: : Mrgreen:

This famous magnet is three meters high and almost five feet wide. The researchers specify that apart from its size, the one that will be manufactured in the long term will be identical. It allows an unprecedented gain in energy consumption. To give an idea: a traditional copper magnet requires around 200 million Watts to confine the plasma, while the one developed by MIT requires only 30 Watts.

This breakthrough would pave the way for an almost infinite and clean source of nuclear energy. The main fuel of the fusion reactor is hydrogen. A chance because it is easily found on our planet, especially in water. It is also a fuel that is of interest to many industries, starting with the automotive and aviation industries. This is the case with Hyundai, which relies heavily on hydrogen in the development of its vehicles.

With this new technology, the nuclear fusion reactor could also be easier, faster and cheaper to manufacture. According to the various stakeholders in the project, a fusion reactor of this type could be operational from 2025, based on this new approach. The researchers set a course: “to eliminate the 10% of carbon emissions generated by the production of electricity”.


Hydrogen is a climatic dead end even with fusion !!! This is to say the scientific level of these "journalists" ....

0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by humus » 06/01/22, 16:09

Christophe wrote:Hydrogen is a climatic dead end even with fusion !!!

Why ? do not understand... : Oops:
0 x
humus
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1951
Registration: 20/12/20, 09:55
x 687

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return of the 30 glorious without GHG




by humus » 06/01/22, 16:19


Ah OK, I didn't know, thank you.

It is true that hydrogen is the most difficult gas to trap.

You can switch to circuit 24 for adults : Arrow: electrical : Mrgreen:
0 x
NCSH
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 206
Registration: 17/11/21, 18:15
Location: Orbiting Venus
x 135

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by NCSH » 06/01/22, 18:51

humus wrote:
Christophe wrote:Are these the same people who promoted pfizer? : Mrgreen:

No, rowdy announcements followed by nothing, it's a job : Mrgreen: : Arrowd:
inventions-innovations / energie-de-nikola-tesla-christophe-tetard-t16562.html
Sorry, I'm starting : roll: : Lol:


Regularly, the fusion tries to return to the front of the stage ... And, as always, it is about smoking!

Even if they could manage to keep their "gadget" running continuously, it would be a 10 MWe monster, which would have to be installed by the sea to cool it. At best, the cost of the electricity produced, in the order of 000 to 30 € / MWh, condemns it as regards the multiple uses of energy: the electricity produced from solar energy has already reached $ 40 / MWhé in 10 in the intertropical strip or its margins.
It is therefore impossible to claim to be competitive to massively produce "energy vectors" (ammonia, reduction of iron ore into primary steel, non-fossil synthetic fuels, etc.) at a lower cost!

So, it is impossible to claim to dominate the energy future with fusion!

As you can see, the Sun does not admit competition, it was through mini-clones!
0 x
To discover the parallel universe of non-fossil carbon energy carriers, take the time to browse (15 min) the website NCSH : http://www.ncsh.eu/language/fr/energie-et-matiere/
User avatar
Exnihiloest
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5365
Registration: 21/04/15, 17:57
x 660

Re: Fusion, unlimited energy, return to the glorious 30s without GES




by Exnihiloest » 06/01/22, 19:09

NCSH wrote:...
Regularly, the fusion tries to return to the front of the stage ... And, as always, it is about smoking!
...


Bin sure not, and it might even happen sooner than expected. Last August Americans already approached the point where the fusion energy becomes greater than the energy expended to produce it:
https://www.techniques-ingenieur.fr/act ... ire-97631/

All the new technologies, as in the past the railroad or the aviation, had their detractors. What was it used for? To nothing. Apart from pissing off even today some citizens who have to take a shuttle to St-Pierre-des-Corps because in Tours the railroad was refused!
The fusion theory is solid, it will work. The dogs bark but the caravan passes.
0 x

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 140 guests