Covid vaccines: how effective? Variants, duration of immunity, efficacy on contamination and on severe cases?

[ABC2019]

abcon and super moron has struck again. Everything you have just written for the vaccinated is valid for the unvaccinated. With your stupid reasoning (that's obvious!) [I] but it can also be, for example, that hospitalized UNVaccinated people are more often immunocompromised and other comorbidities in which the vaccine would not work,

no, hospitalized unvaccinated people are not more often immunocompromised than vaccinated people,

Proof / s?
Connections ?

because there are no more immunocompromised in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, crétinet. The immunocompromised are priority for vaccination.
https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/news/173 ... -entourage

[Janic]

abcon

because there are no more immunocompromised in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, crétinet.

immunosuppression is not only physical but also psychological, which explains why the immunocompromised mildly vaccinated are, possibly, less represented in severe cases, fear being replaced by confidence playing a major role on the IS, placebo effect guaranteed; but not the real serious DUs which will end up in the emergency room like the others.

The immunocompromised are priority for vaccination.

for genocide?
https://www.mesvaccins.net/web/news/173 ... - entourage
* another huge bullshit! Instead of pointing to propaganda sites that you don't even read, carefully read its introduction, which overrides everything else.

[Obamot]

You take the words out of my mouth, this guy is definitely a jerk who didn't get it. And the most pathetic is that he begins to take snippets of what we were already saying a year ago, (ten years ago ...)

no, hospitalized unvaccinated people are not more often immunocompromised than vaccinated people,

Proof / s?
Connections ?

because there are no more immunocompromised in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, crétinet. The immunocompromised are priority for vaccination.

Your link does not say that, it is a catch-up to the branches. BECAUSE OF COURSE YOU DID NOT FIND ANYTHING. You don't know anything about immunosuppression, other than what your absurd connections tell you. But YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING IGNARE CRÉTIN. And so since you don't know anything about it, you are not qualified to select the relevant info.

What you gave is copy paste which does not answer your statement, either you have a study on it or else

=> BIN

[ABC2019]

are you having a contest, the two morons there?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

are you having a contest, the two morons there?

Now that you're in the closet and you can't piss off your colleagues anymore, have you come to push the plug too far here?

[ABC2019]

ah a third in the competition, it will be disputed !!!
especially since he knows about poop gifs, be careful!

[Obamot]

ah a third in the competition, it will be disputed !!!
especially since he knows about poop gifs, be careful!

blah-blah-blah-blah
we are still awaiting confirmation of scientific work on your assertion

because there are no more immunocompromised in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated

Because the possible fact that the immunocompromised are a priority for vaccination is not proof, we want something serious double-blind against placebo, not something done on a compassionate basis.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Already I would like a randomized double-blind study on the effectiveness of Doliprane against the virus of the covid ... even an observational study on the fall of the viral load would be welcome ...

[Christophe]

The fun club maybe?

FK5NcHOXMAA3JGS.jpg (121.51 KiB) Viewed 1991 times

[Christophe]

Finally the Lancet is not so rotten… or is it that the reality is even worse?