Obamot wrote:I told you, ask ...
Well no, I'm asking you. I have never read from Raymond or Blachier that the vaccine had killed hundreds of thousands. But I could be wrong.
Obamot wrote:I told you, ask ...
Christophe wrote:ABC2019 wrote:yes that's it, and 30% of accidents are due to alcohol, which means 70% are due to sober people, so SOBER PEOPLE HAVE MORE ACCIDENTS THAN ALCOHOLICS
So not drinking while driving is killing !!
Thank you goodbye.
Sophism and fraudulent comparison (but we're used to it with you): accidents involving substances (alcohol or others) are much more serious and / or fatal than others ...
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:ABC2019 wrote:So not drinking while driving is killing !!
What a bitch, what a con, what a shit, what a truffle, etc, etc, etc ...
Christophe wrote:
Thank you, you confirm thatwith 63% of vaccinated deaths for 48% of vaccinated hospitalizations, the vaccinated DIE MORE in the hospital than the unvaccinated!
So the vaccine does indeed kill!
Thank you goodbye !
and super moron has struck again. Everything you have just written for the vaccinated is valid for the unvaccinated. With your stupid reasoning (that's obvious!) but it can also be for example that the hospitalized NON vaccinated are more often immunocompromised and other comorbidities in which the vaccine would not work, etc ... Unbridled imagination of the narcissist! Stop cannabis mixed with GHB!and to answer the precise point on the difference in proportion between hospitalized and death, that does not mean that the vaccine "kills", in the sense that the vaccinated die more, it is obvious that they die LESS compared to their population: this means that those who are hospitalized are in a more serious condition than those who are not vaccinated. Is it may be to admission criteria (we will tend more easily to hospitalize an unvaccinated one) [*], but it could also be, for example, that hospitalized vaccines are more often immunocompromised in whom the vaccine did not work, so they die also more often. But obviously, unvaccinated, there would be many more.
Janic wrote:abconand super moron has struck again. Everything you have just written for the vaccinated is valid for the unvaccinated. With your stupid reasoning (that's obvious!) [I] but it can also be, for example, that hospitalized UNVaccinated people are more often immunocompromised and other comorbidities in which the vaccine would not work,and to answer the precise point on the difference in proportion between hospitalized and death, that does not mean that the vaccine "kills", in the sense that the vaccinated die more, it is obvious that they die LESS compared to their population: this means that those who are hospitalized are in a more serious condition than those who are not vaccinated. Is it may be to admission criteria (we will tend more easily to hospitalize an unvaccinated one) [*], but it could also be, for example, that hospitalized vaccines are more often immunocompromised in whom the vaccine did not work, so they die also more often. But obviously, unvaccinated, there would be many more.
Obviously they are less well protected since they are not protected at all, it is in the medical literature, before this domination of BP and its impunity, that the most fragile individuals should not be vaccinated.no, the unvaccinated hospitalized are not more often immunocompromised than the vaccinated, it is precisely the opposite, and that is not the reverse. Because the immunocompromised are much less protected by vaccines.
You haven't understood anything yet, asshole, obviously this kind of consideration far exceeds your intellectual capacities, so I don't quite understand why you keep making fun of yourself in writing anything in every post. Open at least one medical biology book!You haven't figured it out yet, moron, obviously this kind of consideration far exceeds your intellectual capacities, so I don't quite understand why you keep making fun of yourself by writing anything in every post.
but yes abcile but yes ...but yes Janic, but yes ...
We are in a psychotic delirium there, nothing to do.
Proof / s?ABC2019 wrote:Janic wrote:abconand super moron has struck again. Everything you have just written for the vaccinated is valid for the unvaccinated. With your stupid reasoning (that's obvious!) [I] but it can also be, for example, that hospitalized UNVaccinated people are more often immunocompromised and other comorbidities in which the vaccine would not work,and to answer the precise point on the difference in proportion between hospitalized and death, that does not mean that the vaccine "kills", in the sense that the vaccinated die more, it is obvious that they die LESS compared to their population: this means that those who are hospitalized are in a more serious condition than those who are not vaccinated. Is it may be to admission criteria (we will tend more easily to hospitalize an unvaccinated one) [*], but it could also be, for example, that hospitalized vaccines are more often immunocompromised in whom the vaccine did not work, so they die also more often. But obviously, unvaccinated, there would be many more.
no, hospitalized unvaccinated people are not more often immunocompromised than vaccinated people,
Proof / s?ABC2019 wrote:Because the immunocompromised are much less protected by vaccines.
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 247 guests