Eating ORGANIC: no guarantee of food safety

Agriculture and soil. Pollution control, soil remediation, humus and new agricultural techniques.
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 13:28

Janic wrote:
They can perfectly go to the green industry for the same reasons,
What is not sufficiently profitable now!
again and again of the big nonsense, the one who says without knowing the reality on the ground, who is always a metro behind because he draws his information from the net and not from those who know, already installs more than 600m2 solar panel at home and you will be able to talk, you will have an app on your phone, a smartphone eh! not a fixed dial, which will give you your production in real time, the selling price in real time, in short, reliable and current information, and you will be able to know the real profitability of your mini solar power plant, that's field info, verifiable every day, not your usual blah blah

when petrochemicals invest in solar energy, it's good to earn money, and they earn it, all the media hype about ecology is a boon for large companies, especially those in the oil sector who know very well where in are their stocks and they will not wait until they are on the reserve to move on
1 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Janic » 21/05/21, 14:16

again and again of the big nonsense, the one who says without knowing the reality on the ground, who is always a metro behind because he gets his information from the net and not from those who know,
Pov 'spot! I installed static solar heating and hot water in 1976 on my house. One of the few, at this time, of the department. No photovoltaic solar panels much too expensive at this time and without state subsidies.
already install more than 600m2 of solar panel in your home and you will be able to talk, you will have an app on your phone, a smartphone eh! not a fixed dial, which will give you your production in real time, the selling price in real time, in short, reliable and current information, and you will be able to know the real profitability of your mini solar power plant, that's field info, verifiable every day, not your usual blah blah
to be profitable, industrial solar must invade huge areas usually reserved for agriculture, which is silly in itself. But it's only business of course, the rest doesn't matter to them!
The only viable surfaces are the roofs of already existing houses, but an individual installation of this kind is very expensive and not very profitable compared to the necessary investment. So of no interest to the industry!
Neighbors also who had recently installed solar panels on their roofs, had them removed because of no interest and even the municipality had them installed on the cover of the local market and it no longer seems to work according to the panel displaying "the profitability "assumed. But here again it is we who pay.
On the other hand, neighboring farmers have built material storage sheds and they have covered their roofs with panels, for a reduced investment (just the additional cost of the panels and a little more labor.) For them it pays more than farming obviously.
Finally, no company can buy a product above its normal selling price without sinking, but it is the state, and therefore us, who pay for it. It borders on a scam!
when petrochemicals invest in solar energy, it's good to earn money, and they earn it, all the media hype about ecology is a boon for large companies, especially those in the oil sector who know very well where in are their stocks and they will not wait until they are on the reserve to move on
apparently you don't know much about industrial circles. Oil still has a bright future ahead of it, for many uses other than thermal energy, like your beloved chemical meds among others. This is called a small investment in the future you never know.
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 20:55

Janic wrote:
again and again of the big nonsense, the one who says without knowing the reality on the ground, who is always a metro behind because he gets his information from the net and not from those who know,
Pov 'spot! I installed static solar heating and hot water in 1976 on my house. One of the few, at this time, of the department. No photovoltaic solar panels much too expensive at this time and without state subsidies.is it profitable or not? So what goes against what you claim is just above, so the point is you, no
already install more than 600m2 of solar panel in your home and you will be able to talk, you will have an app on your phone, a smartphone eh! not a fixed dial, which will give you your production in real time, the selling price in real time, in short, reliable and current information, and you will be able to know the real profitability of your mini solar power plant, that's field info, verifiable every day, not your usual blah blah
to be profitable, industrial solar must invade huge areas usually reserved for agriculture, which is silly in itself.still false, we can precisely install solar power plants on non-cultivable areas But it is only business of course, the rest does not matter to them!
The only viable surfaces are the roofs of already existing houses, but an individual installation of this kind is very expensive and not very profitable compared to the necessary investment. So of no interest to the industry!
still anything, relaying badly found information, it is profitable, the smartphone says it, and I see it and the bank account too, an investment as soon as it is profitable, it has an interest, a mini-plant of this kind is not an investment for individuals whose depreciation is calculated over 20 years, in industry we are on depreciation much but much shorter, worry as soon as that farmers were able to become electricity producers, the roofs of barns quickly became mini-power stations for those who know how to count

you compare your small solar water heater, with mini-plants, of 600m2 and you pose as an expert in solar, as with your "organic" grocery store from half a century ago which allows you to pose yourself as an organic expert, and to impose your so-called knowledge you only have 'insult argument, really if you only have that as an argument ...
Last edited by Moindreffor the 21 / 05 / 21, 21: 04, 1 edited once.
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Janic » 21/05/21, 20:59

always so bad! The revenues of voltaic panels are still us who pay them once again!
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 21/05/21, 21:01

(And the morons continue to cause us "amortization", "profitability" while it is "commitment", "accountability" and that the first two arguments we do not care. Schools, hospitals, prefectures, courts, Are nurseries intended to be profitable? Fuck you and your mentalities of robotic managers, lobotomized by liberalism)
0 x
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 21:06

Janic wrote:always so bad! The revenues of voltaic panels are still us who pay them once again!

and how do we pay them?
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 21:10

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:(And the morons continue to cause us "amortization", "profitability" while it is "commitment", "accountability" and that the first two arguments we do not care. Schools, hospitals, prefectures, courts, Are nurseries intended to be profitable? Fuck you and your mentalities of robotic managers, lobotomized by liberalism)

except that to pay your schools, your hospitals, your nurseries, and all that does not need to be profitable, it is necessary that others next to come out of profitability
your scanner, your MRI, your operating room must be financed, right ??? So ok don't make any more profits, and we'll see how long the system will last with only expenses, and you come to tell us that we are morons, bug, mobilize your intelligence a little for once, a signature is well following the principles is better
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14823
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 21/05/21, 21:12

(And the morons continue to pretend not to understand anything about taxes ... it's amazing ...)
0 x
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 21:15

Janic wrote:apparently you don't know much about industrial circles. Oil still has a bright future ahead of it, for many uses other than thermal energy, like your beloved chemical meds among others. This is called a small investment in the future you never know.

bug again Janic which mixes with industrial chemistry, petroleum to make meds, and why not "organic" mint cheming-gum naturally : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)
Moindreffor
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5830
Registration: 27/05/17, 22:20
Location: boundary between North and Aisne
x 957

Re: Eating ORGANIC: not a guarantee of food safety




by Moindreffor » 21/05/21, 21:17

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:(And the morons continue to pretend not to understand anything about taxes ... it's amazing ...)

taxes are well taken from profits, don't they?
I've never seen a homeless person pay taxes myself, so if no profitability, no profits, no taxes to pay, it's simple, even you can understand not?
0 x
"Those with the biggest ears are not the ones who hear the best"
(of me)

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 294 guests