Janic wrote:
The difference is only that instead of directly polluting the atmosphere, your nuclear first pollutes the soil for thousands, millions of years before rising in the open air.
chocolate medal.jpg
for simpleton who does not care what will happen to our successors in thousands or millions of years .... after doing the same for our current generations, but worse, big beta!
PS; that's the funny people who don't have children, and don't give a damn about what may happen to them soon, as long as they keep their little selfish comfort!
Janic wrote:
simpletonstupid reasoning, my simpleton pov; it's as if decades ago a zigoto like you had said that coal (and later fuel oil) provided us with 70% of the electricity consumed. Think a little before you say that kind of nonsense.
like wood, coal previously, then fuel oil, much more widespread and used than a few atomic power stations (again and always for military purposes), funny at first and running out of intelligent arguments.Ah, because nuclear power hasn't provided you with around 40% of the electricity you consume for about 70 years? You don't live in France? Or are you isolated from the network, with a generator? Tell us everything....
PS: For my consumption, I am satisfied with the 30% in question!