Ahmed wrote:Le R. Bohringer mixes everything up a bit and it is all the same the debt which, far from bringing all peoples * to their knees, irrigates the economy (I am placing myself here from the point of view of the immanent criticism which is that of the one you quote) .
I don't know if he mixes up but anyway he says a lot of true things.
The policies do not serve much any more, the finance has an undemocratic power, that of distributing the money.
Money also called currency debt, which implies growth, which implies the enslavement of peoples.
To say that it is the blood of the economy is true and we can boast of the positive effects of money, but this very reducing on the negative and perverse effects of money when it is in the form of debt currency.
Absolutely all money in circulation (other than coins and bills) is debt, even our savings.
Someone in the world owes a bank, in the form of a loan, the money we have in savings. There is only one real winner in this system, it is not nature, it is not humanity (except to ignore the negative effects as would a liberal ), these are the banks.
Gael Griraud, from this sequence (1h 02mn) and the 4mn30s which follow evokes the "active" currency instead of the debt currency to finance ecological reconstruction.