for large dilutions, the response will obviously depend on the initial amount of active product. For each initial quantity, there is a dilution beyond which there is no longer any molecule present. The exact value of the number of CH for which the substance disappears depends of course on the initial quantity, but if you give an upper limit of this initial quantity (for example we start from less than 100g), then you can give a value of the number of CH above which you are sure not to have any more molecules in your granule.
We can make it rigorous with numbers but hey we understood that it went way over your head.
And once again you show that you did not understand anything about H and that you did not even try to study it, on the other hand to say and repeat aneries, there you had to study for years of hard work. So more AFIS down there!
I am giving you the correct scientific answer.
No, you give an answer to your AFIS-style sauce and its bunch of broken arms (if not cut!)
If the H. says something else, so it's H. who says anything.
it is especially the ignorant, like you, who mix cabbages and goats, so anything!
If you have any arguments to say it's the H. who is right against the rest of science, then give them.
The H is no more right than your BP products. Either the patients recover or not, it is the one and only criterion, the rest is blabla that characterizes you.
Insults don't take the place of arguments, you continue your ridiculous antics instead of arguing. You're just becoming a sad clown, Janic.
Fortunately, you are here to describe YOU! Characteristic effect of narcissists!
I have already told you and said and re-re-re-said! YOUR science ALWAYS comes after the battle, when the evidence of a fact, verified by experimentation, that is to say experience, PROVES its reality. So your science, AFIS way you can put it deep; you never know it could activate your neurons!
People do not cure themselves with a few scientist's pills, or committee stamps, or other double-blind shots meant to occupy individuals who have nothing else to do. The patients, them, want something which cures them whatever the discourse held on their pseudo-scientific aspect. When you start to understand that, you will have taken a huge step…. But there is work ahead!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
It is quite implied that your insults were directed at me, this is not the first time 
You don't have the balls to assume poor cabbage.