Understanding the covid test (serological, pcr, antigenic) of Sars-Cov2 (and its variants)

[sicetaitsimple]

Is that a poster you picked up at the entrance to the IHU?

[Obamot]

If you have nothing else to do with Kiki the “funny”, there is better to do

[Christophe]

I just posted an article on the Western Blot: https://www.econologie.com/western-blot ... -covid-19/

It contains 2 interesting videos:

[Christophe]

To be verified to confirm ... seems to me that we have already spoken about it above ...

[izentrop]

... seems to me that we have already spoken about it above ...

[Obamot]

https://mobile.twitter.com/SylvianeT1/status/1473729461938016265

To be verified to confirm ... seems to me that we have already spoken about it above ...

But yes, it's been a long time, the CDC announced the end of the authorization of PCRs for the end of the year ... I had made the history

Bye bye PCR? [...]

afraid of confusion with the flu?
Ola and since all this time then we would have confused with the flu?

google trad
After 31.12.2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for authorization of the RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, [...] the CDC provides this advance notice to clinical laboratories in order to have sufficient time to select and implement one of the many alternatives authorized by the FDA.

Visit the FDA website for a list of authorized COVID-19 diagnostic methods. For a summary of the performance of molecular methods approved by the FDA with an FDA reference panel, visit this page.

In preparation for this change, the CDC is recommending clinical labs and testing sites that have used the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR test and begin their transition to another FDA-cleared COVID-19 test. The CDC encourages laboratories to consider adopting a multiplexed method that can facilitate the detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 viruses and influenza. Such testing can make it easier to continue testing for influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save time and resources as influenza season approaches. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected test at their facility before starting clinical testing.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021 ... ing_1.html

!	Message by Obamot
	Ah ... Are we going to read our posts better now? A little history on the invalidation of PCRs as “mass tests”

29/06/20, 23:23
What matters is the ratio of deaths to inpatients
sante-pollution-prevention / demission-du-dr-raoult-partisan-de-la-chloroquine-du-scientific-council-covid19-t16370-3010.html? hilit = pcr # p402716

01/09/20, 13:46
For me he had to talk about the results of MultiPlex PCR tests ...
And there indeed, without going too far, the false positives are of the order of 2% or 3%. [...]
PCR tests are very useful for a quick first sort.
health-pollution-prevention / coronavirus-covid-19-real-time-epidemic-map-t16331-1830.html? hilit = pcr # p409724

It's been a year since we've been saying PCR testing can be messy:

01/10/20, 00:56
Update on cycles in PCR tests.
The number of cycles can distort a good understanding of the pandemic.
health-pollution-prevention / coronavirus-covid-19-real-time-epidemic-map-t16331-2230.html? hilit = pcr # p412888

25/10/20, 16:43
Amplification of 45 times the sequence of the genome of the covid for PCR tests ... but where are we going with this pseudo journalist (who suddenly makes a fool of himself)
sante-pollution-prevention / les-cons-du-coronavirus-t16359-1660.html? hilit = pcr # p415611

15/11/20, 20:53
[...] labs which practice relatively rigged PCR tests (with amplifications of more than 30x, whereas the tests for the detection of coronaviruses are extremely sensitive) [...]
health-pollution-prevention / coronavirus-covid-19-real-time-epidemic-map-t16331-3360.html? hilit = pcr # p419620

From there it all became clearer and clearer

23/11/20, 23:45 [...] it dates from June and still relevant

Coronavirus: why everyone was wrong (II) (by Beda M. Stadler)

4. Common sense immunology

As an immunologist, I trust a biological model, namely that of the human organism, which has built an adaptive and proven immune system. [...] if we do a corona PCR test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small broken part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive as long as there are tiny broken parts of the virus left. Even if infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material.

pollution-prevention-health / the-advances-in-the-fight-against-coronavis-t16395-1030.html? hilit = pcr # p420790
part 1 pollution-prevention-health / the-advances-in-the-fight-against-coronavis-t16395-1020.html? hilit = pcr # p420779

The icing on the cake, make way for Végaz “The expert” taking the FDA as a benchmark:

08/12/20, 20:41
FFABF49B-4689-4740-B96B-D83644DF7610.jpeg sante-pollution-prevention / les-cons-du-coronavirus-t16359-2240.html? hilit = pcr # p422941

Alas the “funny ones” never listen:

12/12/20, 10:06

Dr Mike Yeadon [...] former chief scientist of pharmaceutical giant Pfizer [for 16 years] states that "there is no science to suggest that a second wave should occur" [...] asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are used to fabricate a "second wave" based on "new cases" [he] claims that half, if not "almost all" COVID tests are false positives. [...]
Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that, given the "shape" of all the important indicators in a global pandemic, such as hospitalizations, intensive care use and deaths, “The pandemic is fundamentally over”.

sante-pollution-prevention / demission-du-dr-raoult-partisan-de-la-chloroquine-du-scientific-council-covid19-t16370-5810.html? hilit = pcr # p423478

15/12/20, 09:21
[...] ABC [...] finally understood that the influenza virus was an RNA virus ...
Tomorrow he might understand why bogus PCR tests give you positive for covid by simply detecting a strand of a cold or flu virus sequence! sante-pollution-prevention / les-cons-du-coronavirus-t16359-2370.html? hilit = pcr # p423837

17/12/20, 16:52
[…] A must see, on the reliability of PCR tests:
from 80% to 100% false positives in Switzerland
3040D7AB-0B18-4122-8C18-B46772CE8E39.jpeg
- and at best in this 20% there is a huge proportion of people not sick, or the test reacted on something other than a corona.
- vaccines and side effects ...! The health policy of fear.

His medical advice:
- “do not get vaccinated ”;
- “fear makes you sick and makes your immune system sick, it induces disease"
pollution-prevention-health / the-advances-in-the-fight-against-coronavis-t16395-1060.html? hilit = pcr # p424170

21/12/20, 13:15
[...] the BMJ has just released a paper on this

Covid-19: Mass testing is inaccurate and gives false sense of security, minister admits
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4916

WHO would just admit it too!

WHO admits (finally) PCR tests create false positives https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-f ... -positives

media / the-cancer-seen-by-regenere-t16037-190.html? hilit = pcr # p424512

etc ...

sante-pollution-prevention/coronavirus-covid-19-carte-de-l-epidemie-en-temps-reel-t16331-4570.html?hilit=cdc,%20pcr,%20autorisation#p456900

There you go

[Christophe]

Ah, here I am not 100% sweet yet ...

[ABC2019]

there is absolutely no reference that says PCR covid tests give a positive result with influenza. Mixing with the discussion of the number of PCR cycles, "false positives" are those who test positive when the virus has been mostly destroyed, but bits of RNA remain. It has nothing to do with the flu.

[Christophe]

And lo and behold, ABC is giving lessons to thousands of CDC specialists ...

I believe we have a messiah on this forum !!

[Obamot]

Ah, here I am not 100% sweet yet ...

Look at Izy, ABC ... one doesn't stop the other ( )

(good dog-dog ...) ^ __ ^