GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:He died on August 7, 2019 of pneumonia at the age of 74. His death is NOT suspicious
Yes, but yes and no ...
His death BECAME, suspicious since:
1) there have been assassinations against people who opposed pharmas (this is common knowledge)
2) Karen had repeatedly stated that PCRs should not be used for mass testing because they are totally inappropriate without diagnosis (they only test for “dead” virus, their raw results do not mean RiEN ... Even Switzerland recognized it, and yet continue to use them ...)
3) This annoyed the pharmas because without testing, how to maintain a paranoia, there was therefore a motive.
4) Why did it become a mobile? Because contrary to what has been said according to recent studies, the covid was there long before December 2019 ... We have evidence from September 2019 + incubation => evidence from October ... And signs from June, 2 ' 500 people infected (symptomatic) in August in the USA ...
5) And so there is indeed a coincidence between the appearance of covid in the USA, and the death of Mullis, ironically deceased ... of ... "pneumonia" ...
His death would not be suspicious if:
- there was no correlation with what he said about the mass tests.
- there was no proximity between the syndemic and his death.
- if the PCR tests had been a reliable source of “non-diagnostic” data
- if other means of testing had been quickly implemented after realizing their ineffectiveness ...
- if the reality of the threat had remained at its real proportion => 99,7x% of the population not concerned ...
- if we had not prohibited the promulgation of treatments, which would have meant a fatal halt to the vaccination obligation.
etc ...
I'm not going to list all the clues that we know, of which the main one these pseudos vaccines, it is gnognote ...
That makes big converging clues ...
So I am more reserved about the categorical conclusion of natural death, when we see the billions at stake ...