gnarf, gnarf! The final new formula solution? but on 16.4 million, it does not weigh heavily!With 80 dead, the payment of pensions is partly “settled”, what must be prohibited is playing on the stock market with OUR funds!
The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
by Obamot »03/03/21, 13:57
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Certain (a priori) far-fetched hypotheses deserve to be examined with particular care. This is even truer with the revelations of the bottom of this pandemic which shows a degree of legal corruption never attentive (more or less declared interests) a crime against humanity (Lancet gate on the HCQ) and which splashes up to the highest levels of the state.
So I think it's great to talk about it.
So I think it's great to talk about it.
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 5111
- Registration: 28/09/09, 17:35
- Location: Isére
- x 554
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Obamot wrote:With 80 dead, the payment of pensions is partly “settled”, what must be prohibited is playing on the stock market with OUR funds!
there are 14 retirees in France (figure at the end of 500).
https://www.statistiques-recherches.cna ... %2055,8%20%% 20of the% 20 workforce.
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Hey! It's obvious but that's not what I meant!
I don't even know why you say that .... I was ironic! Guy put in parallel the very rich pensioners VS what we could do with the money they smack
But thank you for your remark.
I don't even know why you say that .... I was ironic! Guy put in parallel the very rich pensioners VS what we could do with the money they smack
I was tongue-in-cheek when I said that for these 80 deaths (covid stats: mostly over 000s) the retirement problem was partly “settled” (since they died). If I said “in part”Because there are CPAM / CIPAV ...Guy wrote:the American retirees of Miami who spend their time on cruises from m .... to rot the countries visited with their pornographic presence [VS] How many unemployed people, families in misery to allow them to swallow themselves?
Obamot wrote:With 80 dead, the payment of pensions is partly “settled”, what must be prohibited is playing on the stock market with OUR funds!
But thank you for your remark.
0 x
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Obamot
this was against me, for the figure of 16.4 million, so source
How many retirees in France? What is the average retirement?
How many retirees in France? What is the average retirement?
The DREES provides updated data on the number of retirees, pension amounts and retirement ages, all schemes combined and by pension scheme, until the end of 2018. The published data relate to beneficiaries of direct and secondary rights and are presented by sex, age, etc. Some tables relate specifically to new retirees.
Workforce and change in the number of directly entitled retirees
End of 2018, 16,4 million people are directly retired from the French plans. Their number increased by 1,3% during the year. This rate remains lower than that observed between 2005 and 2010 but is in line with the trend of recent years. Women represent 52% of retirees. Among the 16,4 million retirees, 83%, i.e. 13,6 million retirees, receive a direct pension from the CNAV and 11,6 million receive a supplementary pension from the association for the supplementary retirement scheme for employees. (Arrco).
All plans combined, 745 retirees liquidate a first direct right to retirement in 000. This number increased by 2018% compared to the previous year.
https://www.capgeris.com/data-senior-17 ... ait%C3%A9s.
this was against me, for the figure of 16.4 million, so source
How many retirees in France? What is the average retirement?
How many retirees in France? What is the average retirement?
The DREES provides updated data on the number of retirees, pension amounts and retirement ages, all schemes combined and by pension scheme, until the end of 2018. The published data relate to beneficiaries of direct and secondary rights and are presented by sex, age, etc. Some tables relate specifically to new retirees.
Workforce and change in the number of directly entitled retirees
End of 2018, 16,4 million people are directly retired from the French plans. Their number increased by 1,3% during the year. This rate remains lower than that observed between 2005 and 2010 but is in line with the trend of recent years. Women represent 52% of retirees. Among the 16,4 million retirees, 83%, i.e. 13,6 million retirees, receive a direct pension from the CNAV and 11,6 million receive a supplementary pension from the association for the supplementary retirement scheme for employees. (Arrco).
All plans combined, 745 retirees liquidate a first direct right to retirement in 000. This number increased by 2018% compared to the previous year.
https://www.capgeris.com/data-senior-17 ... ait%C3%A9s.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Indeed, and besides I think you had halfway understood why I was ironic (by evoking the “final solution”.)
But what parallel do we see there?
I no longer wonder, for example, what could have allowed scientists to write this criminal rag that is the “Codex Alimentarius”(Which was initiated by the WHO, which delegated, then was separated as UN AIDS, hey ... hey ...) how minds raised to the rank of experts can they compromise to standardize products unhealthy food, which are precisely those which are for a large part the cause of the comorbidities that we talk about so much with covid (and which have been overlooked by the general public, for decades ...) and in presenting it as a “confession of helplessness” while the fact that the conditions for their creation is a crime against humanity, for the part which comes down to the responsibility of said “experts”. For the part that therefore comes down to the responsibility of men. I wanted to explain here in plain language for everyone (what we already understood between us) stealthily emerging from your onomatopoeia ... => (gnarf, gnarf!)
Indeed, we regularly oppose the arguments of “devitalized food”, the argument of “cost” and this to justify consequently all processed and industrial products, which inevitably leads to certain aspects of their denaturing. Even though we don't have to denature to keep:
- there are known means, which have no deleterious effect, those where we let 'nature' do the work (lactofermentation, etc.)
- For example, we heat the oils which are already products which keep very well on their own (to increase the yield whereas it is precisely there that the inventiveness of the industrialists should be expressed (not to harm the And there is no need for big means to get there IF WE WANT, since even the Berbers have succeeded, simply by harvesting the olives at full maturity!
- thus, there is a whole panel of products present in Codex, which are unnecessary and should be easily replaced by equivalents presented in “healthy packaging”.
- we are regularly opposed to the argument of “food security” and that consequently “we must already be able to feed the planet, and that without the current means and methods, we would not be able to do it po and bla-bla-bla”. But it is of course a lure, in the era of instantaneous communication and computing, of batch marking with RFID chips and other first-in first-out storage strategies: there is the possibility of ultra-circuits. short (which should be the rule) and quality controls throughout the distribution chain, which can be shortened and optimized to a minimum, to avoid any deterioration, but above all to avoid denaturation / devitalization. These systems exist, but they are used in the economic interest of the large distribution (one picks unripe fruits and vegetables) whereas this should go beyond the simple “organoleptic quality” of the food, so that they express to the maximum. what they can bring to the human body (which cannot be done against nature).
- there is a whole range of products present in Codex, which are quite simply toxic. Another example is that EVERYTHING that governs carbohydrate intake needs to be overhauled - it's one of the biggest scams in agribusiness, products that people have orgies on, while we could do without more than 90% - if you count meat products, there is enough to eradicate hunger in the world, right? In their defense, I would say that the great mass of people are not informed! But with the covid, it shakes up the “certainties”.
- there are a lot of things that I forget, that you will want to complete please ... (?)
Yes, the argument of “cost”, But there is a moment when we reach the limits of the system! With the covid we have hit the wall at least ten times: ecosystems, our relationship to “the company we want”VS the living conditions of the precarious (especially cities), food, public health (physical and mental), scientific research, training, prevention, and of course drugs and vaccines (in relation to the gaps in research causes), corruption in politics and science, total economic collapse, etc. (You surely have others, please give them!).
Well, well, don't come and talk to us about the “cost” again: because the “lockdown” how much does it cost?
All this to say dear friend, that the short sightedness of some in this forum, who try to pass others off as noodles, regularly flops, because they don't see these things, because they don't understand the allusions that we make “among ourselves” (basically, who don't 'does not necessarily appear spontaneously) and which are often a source of confusion for them, which all in all makes them relatively amusing. gnarf, gnarf!
But what parallel do we see there?
I no longer wonder, for example, what could have allowed scientists to write this criminal rag that is the “Codex Alimentarius”(Which was initiated by the WHO, which delegated, then was separated as UN AIDS, hey ... hey ...) how minds raised to the rank of experts can they compromise to standardize products unhealthy food, which are precisely those which are for a large part the cause of the comorbidities that we talk about so much with covid (and which have been overlooked by the general public, for decades ...) and in presenting it as a “confession of helplessness” while the fact that the conditions for their creation is a crime against humanity, for the part which comes down to the responsibility of said “experts”. For the part that therefore comes down to the responsibility of men. I wanted to explain here in plain language for everyone (what we already understood between us) stealthily emerging from your onomatopoeia ... => (gnarf, gnarf!)
Indeed, we regularly oppose the arguments of “devitalized food”, the argument of “cost” and this to justify consequently all processed and industrial products, which inevitably leads to certain aspects of their denaturing. Even though we don't have to denature to keep:
- there are known means, which have no deleterious effect, those where we let 'nature' do the work (lactofermentation, etc.)
- For example, we heat the oils which are already products which keep very well on their own (to increase the yield whereas it is precisely there that the inventiveness of the industrialists should be expressed (not to harm the And there is no need for big means to get there IF WE WANT, since even the Berbers have succeeded, simply by harvesting the olives at full maturity!
- thus, there is a whole panel of products present in Codex, which are unnecessary and should be easily replaced by equivalents presented in “healthy packaging”.
- we are regularly opposed to the argument of “food security” and that consequently “we must already be able to feed the planet, and that without the current means and methods, we would not be able to do it po and bla-bla-bla”. But it is of course a lure, in the era of instantaneous communication and computing, of batch marking with RFID chips and other first-in first-out storage strategies: there is the possibility of ultra-circuits. short (which should be the rule) and quality controls throughout the distribution chain, which can be shortened and optimized to a minimum, to avoid any deterioration, but above all to avoid denaturation / devitalization. These systems exist, but they are used in the economic interest of the large distribution (one picks unripe fruits and vegetables) whereas this should go beyond the simple “organoleptic quality” of the food, so that they express to the maximum. what they can bring to the human body (which cannot be done against nature).
- there is a whole range of products present in Codex, which are quite simply toxic. Another example is that EVERYTHING that governs carbohydrate intake needs to be overhauled - it's one of the biggest scams in agribusiness, products that people have orgies on, while we could do without more than 90% - if you count meat products, there is enough to eradicate hunger in the world, right? In their defense, I would say that the great mass of people are not informed! But with the covid, it shakes up the “certainties”.
- there are a lot of things that I forget, that you will want to complete please ... (?)
Yes, the argument of “cost”, But there is a moment when we reach the limits of the system! With the covid we have hit the wall at least ten times: ecosystems, our relationship to “the company we want”VS the living conditions of the precarious (especially cities), food, public health (physical and mental), scientific research, training, prevention, and of course drugs and vaccines (in relation to the gaps in research causes), corruption in politics and science, total economic collapse, etc. (You surely have others, please give them!).
Well, well, don't come and talk to us about the “cost” again: because the “lockdown” how much does it cost?
All this to say dear friend, that the short sightedness of some in this forum, who try to pass others off as noodles, regularly flops, because they don't see these things, because they don't understand the allusions that we make “among ourselves” (basically, who don't 'does not necessarily appear spontaneously) and which are often a source of confusion for them, which all in all makes them relatively amusing. gnarf, gnarf!
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9772
- Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
- Location: Lower Normandy
- x 2638
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79118
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10973
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
What is the simple message?
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
Christophe wrote:What is the simple message?
that he would like to have one like that?
1 x
whatever.
We will try the 3 posts per day max
We will try the 3 posts per day max
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: The next world: a change in our behavior is essential
It's Kiki! _ _
It would be well if he explained all “that” to us with a “GOSSE curve”! _
(because it's subliminal with him, him, him ...)
It would be well if he explained all “that” to us with a “GOSSE curve”! _
(because it's subliminal with him, him, him ...)
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 9 Replies
- 1810 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
16/08/22, 23:35A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 71 Replies
- 8900 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
09/06/21, 19:53A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 27 Replies
- 10032 views
-
Last message by ENERC
View the latest post
11/04/20, 21:15A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 10 Replies
- 8902 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
15/06/16, 13:30A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 2 Replies
- 2923 views
-
Last message by the middle
View the latest post
03/01/12, 09:04A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 262 guests