GuyGadebois wrote:e.g. Orban, Putin, Trump, Bolsonaro, Macron and Erdoğan should be in a lunatic asylum
They're not all in the same category, are they?
I am not inclined to support plutocracies and even less dictatorships, but still ...
The “next world” requires thinking about the political world first. If as Grelinette suggests, it is up to “the man to change”,
Grelinette wrote:It's not the paradigm that must be changed, it's the men
then it would be good to have:
A) the political / psychological maturity for a change to take place, or so ...
B) a political maturity which would underlie psychological maturity. And so you have to see the state of the “great powers” ...
There Guy, you would not have forgotten Xi Jingping by chance?
Xi Jinping with China (which is not very hawkish, except for its “legitimate” land claims ...)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... nd_battlesPutin representing 'Russia'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_w ... ing_RussiaTrump representing the 'USA':
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_w ... ted_StatesIt should be noted that, unlike China and Russia (which are classified as autocratic regimes in the West), the USA is allegedly a "democracy" (or liberal totalitarianism?), And in almost permanent war since the Second World War. ..
China rout as Russia have each time been at war in the former countries of the block of the EST but not for an expansionist policy on a world scale (but more often because of the incursions / provocations of the CIA or private militias) while in Yalta it was clear that NATO had pledged not to advance east.
So should we not disentangle where the center of gravity of the politico-economic world is, before hastily concluding that everything is ruined because we are led by "insane" (which is not completely false, it is not my point)