Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by pedrodelavega » 03/10/22, 20:27

robob wrote:
Macro wrote:In any case...Covid symptomatic since Saturday...With no other care than rest and paracetamol...and am still alive...

You have to be careful with this virus: an acquaintance, nurse, 50 years old, no comorbidity, caught the virus 15 days ago. She stayed in bed for 4 days, with high fever during the 4 days and "like a bar on the lungs with difficulty in breathing", according to these words.

She is vaccinated 3 doses of course.

At the request of my wife who does not want to get angry with her girlfriend, I did not offer her my Ivermectin for pigs bought on Aliexpress for €9 for a box of 100 5mg tablets. : Mrgreen:

Maybe she has a doctor to consult... before following any advice from the first comer who thinks he is a doctor of medicine because he has seen on the internet that... etc etc...
1 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by pedrodelavega » 03/10/22, 21:09

robob wrote:I remain at your disposal for any clarification, if however a point seems obscure to you.
well i need please : Arrowd:

You say:
robob wrote:Why assume that the person who catches covid at 2 months will stop the protocol? (Take the IVM every 15 days). At best, being positive or symptomatic, she will intensify the treatment by taking 10 to 15 mg per day or even more for 5 or 6 days. The study clearly states that it is the plurality tablets taken during the 5 months.

But this is not what M Molimard assumes:
“If you caught Covid at two months, you are not in the group that was treated with ivermectin, since you did not have 180 mg, you are in the rejected group. »

"you are in the rejected group" does not want to say "you stop the treatment".
It defines the group in which "you" are affected in the study.
1 x
Robob
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 900
Registration: 12/04/13, 14:28
x 1235

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by Robob » 04/10/22, 10:39

pedrodelavega wrote:But this is not what M Molimard assumes:
“If you caught Covid at two months, you are not in the group that was treated with ivermectin, since you did not have 180 mg, you are in the rejected group. »

"you are in the rejected group" does not want to say "you stop the treatment".
It defines the group in which "you" are affected in the study.


“Since you didn't get 180 mg, you're in the rejected group. »
Molimard considers that people who have not had 180mg are excluded.
Outside the study divides IVM users into 3 groups:
1- those who over the 5 months have consumed less than 60g: therefore users irregular or having stopped treatment before 60mg.
2- those who have consumed more than 180 mg: therefore users regular.
3- the excluded : those who consumed between 60mg and 180mg.


Molimard does not assume: he (voluntarily?) omits the group of <60mg, in which is found all those who stopped at the beginning (less than 2 months) or would have been irregular in the protocol during the 5 months. It also (voluntarily??) overlooks the results of this group which, despite its irregularity, obtains better results than the "without" group.

https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851- ... 2-subjects

Paragraph Methods:
"The definitions of regularity were as follows: usersregular had 180 mg or more of ivermectin and the users irregular had up to 60 mg, in total, throughout the program"

Results paragraph:
"Among ivermectin users, 33 (971%) used it irregularly (up to 29,8 mg) and 60 (8%) used it regularly (over 325 mg). The 7,3 remaining participants were not included in the analysis.”

Paragraph Study Procedures and Data Collection:
"Ivermectin users have been divided in terms of the cumulative dose of ivermectin taken.
The analysis focused on data from participants who used up to 60 mg (10 tablets) of ivermectin and those who used more than 180 mg (more than 30 tablets). Grouping users in this way represented greater certainty of regularity and irregularity, respectively. These groups were compared to non-users in a three-group comparative analysis.

All this is very clear.

If you find in the study the slightest paragraph indicating another method of exclusion, do not hesitate to underline it: I am for a constructive approach.
2 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13645
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by izentrop » 22/10/22, 03:24

0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by Obamot » 22/10/22, 03:56

You're cooked in your perpetual Izy diversions. It's becoming systematic, pathetic... there's no point in continuing to publish biased studies which, through various vices, would manage to prove to you that a dog would be a cat and that a cat would be a fish. How they manage to show you that a molecule that has never harmed anyone for 50 years, would suddenly become deadly thanks to the subterfuge of overdosing.... Studies obviously sponsored by pharmas who do not care hide even more, since they want to sell their injections which really do not work!

While it only took one meta-analysis to prove that off-label molecules are effective!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by Janic » 22/10/22, 08:00

of biased studies who by various vices would succeed in proving to you that a dog would be a cat and that a cat would be a fish.
that's exactly it theory (smoker) of evolution! : roll: :(
1 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13645
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by izentrop » 25/10/22, 02:12

It will please our two zozos...
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by Obamot » 26/10/22, 03:57

(And Izzy to tell us again about “how he wouldn't fight the flu” and he spends the little time he has left)
0 x
pedrodelavega
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3791
Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
x 1311

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by pedrodelavega » 27/10/22, 06:51

robob wrote:If you find in the study the slightest paragraph indicating another method of exclusion, do not hesitate to underline it: I am for a constructive approach.
when, even one of the authors recognizes the weaknesses of their study....
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: Opinions about Ivermectin? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?




by Obamot » 27/10/22, 07:08

Watch out for the flu! Hey 'funny ones': do you think you're going to make it through the winter guys-teens :D https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/teens
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 271 guests