Ivermectin Reviews? Drug 99,8% effective in 48 hours against COVID-19?

[VetusLignum]

IVM does much better than HCQ in this Egyptian study (even in severe cases):

Emy0j6_W8Asw_rc.png (6.74 KiB) Viewed 1869 times

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v1

To verify however, it is so huge

[VetusLignum]

Excellent result of IVM prophylaxis in this study in Argentina: no infection in the treated group
http://www.pharmabaires.com/1739-result ... salud.html

IVM is combined there with Iota Carrageenan.
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carragh%C3%A9nane
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200 ... tions.aspx

But the important component seems to be the IVM
https://diariolaopinion.com.ar/contenid ... favorables

[Christophe]

And here we were AGAIN because of it forum!!

...I bet now the vaccine vendors will all do to break the IVM ...

[izentrop]

And here we were AGAIN because of it forum!!

A single observational study is not a bit quick to conclude

[izentrop]

Ah well, I had not validated this post. In fact there are 2 observational studies which do not appear to be peer-reviewed.
https://www.trialsitenews.com/argentina ... -covid-19/
et https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-100956/v2

In vitro studies do not count, as we have seen with HCQ

[Christophe]

Izy, it is not because a study is not accepted that it is worth nothing and especially that you have to wait for the acceptance to read it!

So 2 remarks, one serious, one less ...

a) Nature's study on aerosols which I spoke about yesterday took almost 5 months to be accepted! It is 5 months of "lost" in the management of the crisis !!

b) there is a problem of semantics currently ... You must not say "not validated by peers" but "not validated by the labbies"...
Labbies = Lab Lobbies ... and there are a lot of labbies minions !!

In other words: I believe that the peers who still have a good pair guaranteeing their impartiality (= no corruption or pressure however minimal) are rare ...

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Mr. Minister, effective treatment and prevention are available against Covid-19

"It is essential that this treatment becomes immediately available in Belgian hospitals to treat severe forms of Covid-19."

[izentrop]

there is currently a semantic problem ... We must no longer say "not validated by peers" but "not validated by labbies" ....
Labbies = Lab Lobbies ... and there are a lot of labbies minions !!

It's your point of view.
mine is like the RC, not being a specialist, I rely on scientific consensus

Today, nearly thirty publications, reviewed and corrected, believe that Ivermectin has not proven its effect against Covid-19.

https://www.francetvinfo.fr/replay-radi ... 37753.html

If so, WHO or the HCSP would advise it.

Mr. Minister, effective treatment and prevention are available against Covid-19

"It is essential that this treatment becomes immediately available in Belgian hospitals to treat severe forms of Covid-19."

It's your new whooping cough looks like

[Christophe]

Can we therefore conclude that there is one peer in 30 who has a pair?

[izentrop]

a pair ?

of marbles?