Advances in the fight against the coronavirus

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Original

Salt water July 1
Does salt water cure coronavirus? UK launches study to find out
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/b ... voir-2823/

Nano sponges
A “nano-sponge” to counter the coronavirus
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ... rus-81781/

[GuyGadebois]

Nano sponges <<< It's very promising!

But....

[Christophe]

Drink Byrrh !!

Byrrh.png (499.41 KiB) Viewed 1783 times

Byrrh is a brand of French cinchona created in Thuir, Pyrénées-Orientales, in 1866, the Byrrh brand having been registered in 1873. It is a wine with the addition of mistelle and flavored mainly with quinine.

The brand belongs to the company Pernod Ricard for having bought it with the other assets of Cusenier

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byrrh

ps: I had never seen it anywhere before today ...

[Christophe]

Good comment of this video:

Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.

- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?

At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Good comment of this video:

Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.

- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?

At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.

Good summary of what we rehashed here.

[Christophe]

Yes absolutely, and I like his (too nice) theory of incompetence

But we are stupid: it is no longer a theory but a practice ...

[ABC2019]

Good comment of this video:

Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.

- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?

At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.

Good summary of what we rehashed here.

it just proves that "here" is also a hotbed of conspiracy. Funny how you thought you knew exactly where the incompetence of our rulers ends, did you raise them?

[Obamot]

Good comment of this video:

Good summary of what we rehashed here.

it just proves that "here" is also a hotbed of conspiracy. Funny how you thought you knew exactly where the incompetence of our rulers ends, did you raise them?

Or...
Option 2, 3, 4, 5: you miss a lot:
- skills to discern the essential points?
- spirit of synthesis to reach the appropriate conclusions?
- humility to know how to stop commenting in areas that are not yours?
- a combination of all these parameters (I opt for this one, the “5”)

[Christophe]

did you raise them?

No, but these are our employees ... the most casual employees that exist ...

[Christophe]

did you raise them?

No, but these are our employees ... the most casual employees that exist ...

https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/entry/tui ... c301f1a2a1

Mélenchon also calls himself "the employee of the French people"
"This is not the event of the century either", relativizes the boss of the Insoumis.