Original
Salt water July 1
Does salt water cure coronavirus? UK launches study to find out
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/b ... voir-2823/
Nano sponges
A “nano-sponge” to counter the coronavirus
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ... rus-81781/
Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
- Adrien (ex-nico239)
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9845
- Registration: 31/05/17, 15:43
- Location: 04
- x 2150
- GuyGadebois
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6532
- Registration: 24/07/19, 17:58
- Location: 04
- x 982
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:Nano sponges <<< It's very promising!
But....
1 x
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Drink Byrrh !!
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byrrh
ps: I had never seen it anywhere before today ...
Byrrh is a brand of French cinchona created in Thuir, Pyrénées-Orientales, in 1866, the Byrrh brand having been registered in 1873. It is a wine with the addition of mistelle and flavored mainly with quinine.
The brand belongs to the company Pernod Ricard for having bought it with the other assets of Cusenier
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byrrh
ps: I had never seen it anywhere before today ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Good comment of this video:
Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.
- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?
At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- Adrien (ex-nico239)
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9845
- Registration: 31/05/17, 15:43
- Location: 04
- x 2150
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Christophe wrote:Good comment of this video:Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.
- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?
At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.
Good summary of what we rehashed here.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Yes absolutely, and I like his (too nice) theory of incompetence
But we are stupid: it is no longer a theory but a practice ...
But we are stupid: it is no longer a theory but a practice ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:Christophe wrote:Good comment of this video:Conspiracy begins where stupidity is no longer sufficient to explain "errors".
There comes a point when the conspiracy theory ends up becoming more believable than the incompetence theory.
- No masks, Ok ... But to tell us that it is useless?
- small posters in airports instead of closing borders, at a time when information from China was already making it clear that it was serious.
- Hydroxychloroquine hit with a restriction a few days before the epidemic in France. Unfortunate coincidence?
- Hydroxychloroquine only authorized to treat patients in respiratory distress, when precisely, this is the worst moment to administer it: incompetence?
- Redemsivir not attacked by the Media and still authorized while it is more toxic: an oversight?
- Rivotril authorized, even recommended, while it practically plays the role of a "gentle" euthanizing agent for patients with Covid19: incompetence?
- Lancet study immediately validated by the scientific council and by the government when it takes three seconds to see that it is bogus: incompetence?
- Professor Raoult criticized by all mainstream media: a coincidence that all media follow the same point of view?
- Vets who do not receive a response to their offer to provide tests: negligence?
- And now we learn here that they choose precisely the worst test: incompetence again?
Do we still believe in the theory of incompetence or will it take yet more to finally seriously consider that of conspiracy?
Has "conspiracy" become a shameful swear word that we would not even dare to pronounce by dint of having been demonized and hunted down by the authorities?
At a certain point, the repeated mistakes start to be too numerous to be explained by incompetence.
Good summary of what we rehashed here.
it just proves that "here" is also a hotbed of conspiracy. Funny how you thought you knew exactly where the incompetence of our rulers ends, did you raise them?
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
ABC2019 wrote:Adrien (ex-nico239) wrote:Christophe wrote:Good comment of this video:
Good summary of what we rehashed here.
it just proves that "here" is also a hotbed of conspiracy. Funny how you thought you knew exactly where the incompetence of our rulers ends, did you raise them?
Or...
Option 2, 3, 4, 5: you miss a lot:
- skills to discern the essential points?
- spirit of synthesis to reach the appropriate conclusions?
- humility to know how to stop commenting in areas that are not yours?
- a combination of all these parameters (I opt for this one, the “5”)
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
ABC2019 wrote:did you raise them?
No, but these are our employees ... the most casual employees that exist ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79304
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11037
Re: Advances in the fight against the coronavirus
Christophe wrote:ABC2019 wrote:did you raise them?
No, but these are our employees ... the most casual employees that exist ...
https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/entry/tui ... c301f1a2a1
Mélenchon also calls himself "the employee of the French people"
"This is not the event of the century either", relativizes the boss of the Insoumis.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 33 Replies
- 4830 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
22/11/23, 15:20A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 134 Replies
- 12830 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/05/23, 06:33A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 18 Replies
- 3655 views
-
Last message by Obamot
View the latest post
28/08/22, 23:28A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 9 Replies
- 1886 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
16/08/22, 23:35A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 35 Replies
- 6322 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
07/08/23, 12:38A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 284 guests