If I dared (and without being too mistaken) I would say roughly that these idiots wanted to go too fast, simultaneously tackling a problem affecting many areas such as coronavirus immunogenetics, immunosuppression, immunomodulation, with convergences towards oncology and comorbid conditions (to name a few, in short ...) and this, we see, by having aimed much too large, in a kind of mix involving epigenetics on the model of a zoonosis: the total!GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:If I dared, I would point out to you that Molnupiravir works exactly the same way as Remdesivir and that in addition it is a proven carcinogen ...
With in the end, the astonishing sequence that we discovered (by the NIH / Fauxi-gate and Pfizer-gate):
1) hacking of a coronavirus in the lab - apart from any consideration relating to its ecosystem - having resulted in millions of deaths;
2) while having under their elbow the “providential” pseudo-solution to solve the problem created ... their pseudo-vax ...
3) and lying to governments and the entire planet to try to achieve their ends: “create a new captive market”
But now, this led them to be confronted with the natural model, which as they are not interested in the causes, does not react at all as they might expect. VS their models which cannot integrate such a concentrate of various complexities (and which is in question) ... And baaam they are in the wall. As they have been in the wall with their macchins-vax nicknames ... What they do is not completely zero but comes from apprentice sorcerers who do not control their subject (for lack of truncated data): it is just off the mark, it is forcing ... It is diametrically the opposite of what the pharmas announced to us a few years ago, “the genetic approach to diseases,
had to be the holy grail to offer personalized, totally individualized care solutions ...”Except that it is a model which is not profitable! This was therefore quickly overtaken by the implacable industrial logic of the price war and resulted in this “health clash”.