Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[Obamot]

Sources?

On what do you base yourself to affirm it and on what it is based him?

[Remundo]

See more clearly...

What I find huge is that he harps on his "they made us believe that hcq kills 10% of people".
What is wrong: Either he is in bad faith or very incompetent.

refresh your memory on the Lancet Gate

[Remundo]

it is very easy to separate the honest from the twisted.

the honest are those whom the twisted oligarco-globalist system persecutes.

Raoult may not have been right about everything, but he did the best he could with sincerity.

this is not the case for the journalists who invective him and even less for the apparatchik professors bribed by big pharma, McKinsey and Macron.

[izentrop]

See more clearly...

What I find huge is that he harps on his "they made us believe that hcq kills 10% of people".
What is wrong: Either he is in bad faith or very incompetent.

refresh your memory on the Lancet Gate

Study withdrawn after 13 days, might as well forget it...

Those of the IHU on the HCQ have never been withdrawn, while they are full of irregularities.

What is also true is the increased risk of hospital mortality following HCQ treatment and worse with HCQ + macrolide observed in a large number of studies, but not at the IHU, since they only selected healthy patients. https://www.apmnews.com/depeche/46958/3 ... ere-accrue
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ... see-80151/

[Janic]

refresh your memory on the Lancet Gate

izymentor

Study withdrawn after 13 days... might as well forget it...

less than PASTEUR IN HIS time, but which served as a basis for all the anti RAOULT provaxxes of which you and which you have not denied since!

Those of the IHU on the HCQ have never been withdrawn, while they are full of irregularities.

much less than Pasteur, in his time, who would be called a crook and a charlatan today but whom the whole medical profession, blessed asses yes yes continue to take as a reference. But even with irregularities in the protocols, unsuitable in the circumstance, it is not inefficiency unlike the vaccine which made a resounding flop expected...like all the other vaxxes on the market.

What is also true is the increased risk of hospital mortality following HCQ treatment and worse with HCQ + macrolide observed in a large number of studies, but not at the IHU, since they only selected healthy patients. https://www.apmnews.com/depeche/46958/3 ... era-increased
https://www.futura-sciences.com/sante/a ...see-80151/

lies upon lies from provaxx! Healthy patients who tested positive, like those who were vaccinated for nothing? Or doped with paracetamol?

[izentrop]

Study withdrawn after 13 days... might as well forget it...
but which served as the basis for all provaxx

No, a pretext for antivax to decry research.

Well the Canadians have understood the Raoult phenomenon...
Well summed up, it looks like the tide has turned...

And now, in this doomsday climate, this bearded guru with long white hair arrived. A rebellious savior, just like in the movies. A French microbiologist and his miracle cure: hydroxychloroquine.

Didier Raoult had conducted a study on around twenty patients – excluding from his modest sample those who had had the bad idea of ​​dying or ending up in intensive care along the way. The result, of course, was fabulous.

To the scientists who were already sounding the alarm, criticizing his rickety sample, Dr. Raoult retorted that "the weaker the sample of a clinical test, the more significant its results". Ah good. He then declared, peremptorily, that “any trial that includes more than 1000 people is a trial that seeks to demonstrate something that does not exist”.

Three years later, Didier Raoult has just pre-published a study, this time on… 30 patients! Decidedly, the contradiction does not scare him.

However, he is right about one thing. This new study seeks to “demonstrate something that does not exist”: the effectiveness of its famous treatment with hydroxychloroquine.

Prof Raoult claims to have saved 800 patients from death, during the pandemic, at the Institut hospitalo-universitaire (IHU) Méditerranée Infection in Marseille.

Small useful reminder for those who have not followed well: many studies – well done, these – have concluded that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective in reducing the viral load of a patient infected with the COVID virus. -19. On this, the scientific debate is closed.

But Dr. Raoult persists and signs. Again, he adopts a twisted methodology to arrive at the desired conclusion. He is comparing apples and oranges. Or, more specifically, young patients, who received his treatment, and elderly patients with heart conditions, who did not receive it because hydroxychloroquine was contraindicated for them.

Guess who survived the best? Yes, the lucky ones who received his treatment. Miracle !

This time is enough. Didier Raoult went too far. And it's not just a problem of methodology. The scandal goes far beyond that.

On May 28, 16 French learned societies signed a column in Le Monde to denounce the "largest 'wild' therapeutic trial known to date". They call on the public authorities to put an end to the impunity enjoyed by Dr Raoult for three years.

Read the forum
It doesn't happen anymore. In the spring of 2020, one could still claim the urgency of the epidemic outbreak. To save lives, we could afford to snag ethics and scientific protocols. Not anymore.

We can no longer allow the administration of a treatment that science knows is useless to 30 people. Dr. Raoult has transformed these people into guinea pigs, prescribing an experimental cocktail for them outside of any ethical and legal framework, denounce the signatories of the forum.

Incredibly, these massive prescriptions “continued more than a year after their ineffectiveness was formally demonstrated”. And their very real risks. Heart risks, first. Risks of pushing people to refuse vaccination, then.

A month before succumbing to COVID-19, did the brothers Grichka and Igor Bogdanov not quote Didier Raoult to justify their refusal of the injection? How many other followers of guru Raoult, in France and elsewhere, have suffered the same fate? How many indirect deaths?

And above all: how to explain the desperate complacency of the French authorities towards the man who must be described as a charlatan of COVID-19? They knew about the data hack. For sloppy studies. For tortuous methodologies. For exposing patients to unnecessary and risky treatment. They did nothing, or almost nothing.

Looks like the tide is finally turning. On Tuesday, the French government condemned Dr. Raoult's study, seeing it as a "new breach of ethical and deontological rules". On Wednesday, a search was carried out at the IHU Méditerranée Infection. The noose is tightening around the microbiologist from Marseille.

True to form, Didier Raoult responded with an insult, claiming not to have read this "Fools' forum" and showing monumental sufficiency. “He never tolerated contradiction. It's impossible to survive with him if you don't agree on everything. This behavior pushed him to isolate himself, to cut himself off from all criticism and to lock himself inside a sphere of adoration, ”explains his daughter, Magali Carcopino-Tusoli, to the magazine L’Express.

She hasn't spoken to her father for 10 years. “He dreamed of being a Nobel Prize winner, he became a leader of conspiracy theorists and antivax. “Sad observation. In a way, her insufferable father is indeed genius, she admits: “To be able to do anything to this extent is, indeed, genius. »

https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/chro ... raoult.php

[Robob]

Izy, let us go for a bit grappas with the IHU and Raoult. If we want your info cans, we just have to turn on the TV.

There is no study on 30 patients: these are the results of the IHU with the different protocols used there. They are better than anywhere else.

These are not your puppets to tweet, welcomed with open arms by journalists prostitutes by a government corrupt with subsidies straight out of our levies that will change anything. It's been a long time since all these clowns have been debunked, we are not going to do it again.

Now, if you have fun pretending to be a balthing with a growing majority of people who have understood that we don't care about their mouth , you can continue: at your own risk. The truth will come out with all the more violence that we have tried to disguise it.

(I'm trying new smileys, I hope you like it inflated. )

[Janic]

he does not even try to be right since each of his sites have become obsolete by the reality on the ground. His only motivation is to vomit everywhere to vomit and rot this site; like all the freaks of the zetetic.

[Remundo]

I think for my part that it is a lobbyist of Macronie.

His zeal and his macronist alignment on almost all subjects appear very suspect.

A lobbyist's mission is to support an influence group by all means.

[Christophe]

We are the good guys!
All the authors (including me) of the preprint which is so frightening by showing that we could treat, have decided, in solidarity with Professor Lagier threatened by the management, to withdraw the preprint so as not to suggest a betrayal of his share and to protect the youngest.
The authors were indeed threatened with sanctions in public by Mr Braun, Minister of Health, in the Senate, without trial, without defense!!!
Under the pretext that the care that saved so many people (which we do not want to talk about) would have been a trial and not quality care.
The only guinea pigs are those who have been vaccinated, by an illegal trial due to the absence of unconstrained consent.
The healed and cured were not guinea pigs but lucky ones!
I'm not afraid, the truth circulates and will circulate, count on me!