Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[izentrop]

She was right, but the authorities turned a blind eye.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

You are still swollen to bring out this good woman ... One of the most corrupt of his "club". You're really ashamed of nothing, Izy ....

[izentrop]

No it's him

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Yes, that's what I'm saying, there is no longer a limit to the abjection of the corrupt and the embittered and vengeful idiots of Nazetetics. You are stacked up.

[Obamot]

She was right, but the authorities turned a blind eye.

Izy, this is where I have a serious problem with you, you know how to be smart about your choices, but it's not constant. Maybe you could stop your pointless provocations and go back to being a “normal and responsible” person, who would finally put his brain completely to use for the things that are worth it. Let go of the “Raoult character”, which you dislike so much, to devote yourself to the SUBSTANCE, to the material. If you honestly did that, you would find things and improve. I hope you will.

There is no reason that others can do it and not you.

[Robob]

That's it: I know it's funny big hairy trolls once in a while, but now we know you're smart guys. You know very well that this is a smear campaign serving either to divert attention or to hit on a nuisance. Same thing in Brazil: we attack on form when we are losing on substance.

If HCQ and IVM weren't working at all and the vaccinated countries were free-covid while the rest were at the bottom of the epidemic abyss with hospitals overwhelmed and deaths in spades, the press wouldn't go down this foul path.

[ABC2019]

If HCQ and IVM weren't working at all and the vaccinated countries were free-covid while the rest were at the bottom of the epidemic abyss with hospitals overwhelmed and deaths in spades, the press wouldn't go down this foul path.

I reread your sentence three times and it still remains incomprehensible

and as said on the other thread, curative treatments have absolutely no reason to act on the number of patients; We are in the magical thought there, why not the processions too?

[Obamot]

If HCQ and IVM weren't working at all and the vaccinated countries were free-covid while the rest were at the bottom of the epidemic abyss with hospitals overwhelmed and deaths in spades, the press wouldn't go down this foul path.

I reread your sentence three times and it still remains incomprehensible

and as said on the other thread, curative treatments have absolutely no reason to act on the number of patients; We are in the magical thought there, why not the processions too?

Slight syntax error? Well in any case I understood ...

On the other hand, your speech is because you consider the virus / s as useless, as having no function. It is a very archaic approach. Then talks about curative when it comes to being early and / or preventive ... And that ... 18 months later, you still haven't understood! You can gloat on “the range of incomprehensibilities. you're at the TOP.

If they do not act on the number of patients, they help to change course and avoid going through the “intensive care” box ...!

You persist in not wanting to understand it using all kinds of pretexts and artefacts ...
Who you ride mystery for, but it's more and more clear!

[Remundo]

a retrospective video of the actions of the IHU since the beginnings of COVID19

very interesting.

A good record.

[Obamot]

https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-les-de ... nce-raoult