Covid and Didier Raoult (supporter of hydroxychloroquine): analyzes on the pandemic

[Macro]

I fear that you lack a lack of mental capacity.

Very clever way to admit that it is intelligent ... As what it lacks is the "lack of" must we then understand that it is "full of" ... In short the more I pedal less quickly, the less I move faster ...

[Obamot]

Bein woui, I'm funny, you don't understand, he is “so smart" well decrypted!

[GuyGadebois]

a spoiled old man has a melon not possible.

There for once, a "it is he who says who is" is essential! In fact, it couldn't stick better. If Raoult were spoiled, compared to him, you would be an amoeba, and again, a deranged amoeba. Do you see the comparative "scale"?

[Obamot]

One who appears to have no connection of interest in this matter:

What the fuck manipulator you are, you bring out an interview published BEFORE the conclusions of “recovery” ...
And that omits a considerable number of facts!

And Raoult never said that 4,5 billion people take hydroxychloroquine, he wanted to make it clear that the countries that use it represented this population there. This gentleman is a born fabricator!

Edit by Remundo:
Obamot: lift your foot, you make too many personal attacks.

[pedrodelavega]

you bring out an interview published BEFORE the conclusions of “recovery” ...

The conclusions of Recovery on Hydroxychloroquine were published before this interview. What conclusions are you talking about?

[Obamot]

you bring out an interview published BEFORE the conclusions of “recovery” ...

The conclusions of Recovery on Hydroxychloroquine were published before this interview. What conclusions are you talking about?

But what do you think, huh?

Conclusions or not whatever, this video is clearly defamatory and should not have been posted (or should be removed).
There is therefore no personal attack if we base ourselves on the facts. I'm only talking about the facts.

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Results of the Medscape survey

Impact of the Covid crisis on medical ethics: survey results
https://francais.medscape.com/diaporama ... ue&faf=1#1

fig1.png (245.04 KB) Viewed 1024 times

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

Good then the light horses of Gilead, now that Remdesivir will become the only official medicine to cure Covid it will be necessary to justify your emoluments and work a little positively (that will change) to convince us that this treatment at 2000 € is the pearl we expected.

A slightly less idyllic vision of the thing
Remdesivir: does the European Medicines Agency endanger our health?
http://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/ ... r-la-sante

Other studies that have come out on this medoc
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanc ... 40-6736(20) 31022-9 / Fulltext
In this study of adult patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19, remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits.
https://www.srlf.org/reactu/remdesivir- ... e-aveugle/
In this study, remdesivir did not reduce improvement time or mortality in patients with a severe form of COVID 19.

For an official drug we cannot say that it is fantastic as results ...
But as everyone buys all of Gilead's production, well, let's say that the lab did a good job.

A small summary of the goose that lays the golden eggs
https://www.ouest-france.fr/sante/virus ... is-6896457

[izentrop]

He recommended it or not recommended it, will understand Charles https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/202 ... nt_1792383

[Adrien (ex-nico239)]

And should remdesivir be recommended or not?