Bullshit and idiocy around the Coronavirus (actions, words, decisions ...)

How to stay healthy and prevent risks and consequences on your health and public health. occupational disease, industrial risks (asbestos, air pollution, electromagnetic waves ...), company risk (workplace stress, overuse of drugs ...) and individual (tobacco, alcohol ...).
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9772
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by sicetaitsimple » 03/05/21, 18:49

Macro wrote:
Obamot wrote:There is in these “food standards“Probably 80% of the causes of pathologies with which the world population is affected (including the comorbidities of which we speak so much). Whether deliberate or not, it is indeed a population reduction tool that kills them prematurely.



Well .... It seems to have worked really well .... We have reduced the population of the planet from 3,2 billion in 1962 to 7.7 today ....


After all, it is not with the comparison of two vague figures that you are going to dispute that the Codex Alimentarius "is indeed a tool for reducing the population which kills it prematurely"?
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by ABC2019 » 03/05/21, 18:56

Janic wrote:
if it takes a hit at the time of epidemics and wars, it means on the contrary that it is a useful indicator. It would be if it did not move on the contrary, that it would be a proof that it has no value.
no USEFUL value if there is no explanation for this cookie-cutter average as if it is the real age of the lifespan. Old people live neither older nor less old than before!


I confirm: all those over 60 ... live at least 60 years.

There are a lot more of them than before, that's all.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Obamot » 03/05/21, 19:00

And what did I say! You just sweetened the part that gets worse : Arrowd:

Obamot wrote:Damn, it's stupid, he's been missing the stats for 9 years... So we can't see that it's gotten worse! especially last year

DE16F780-4A8A-4477-ABC0-004D10424843.jpeg
DE16F780-4A8A-4477-ABC0-004D10424843.jpeg (351.68 KiB) Viewed 335 times

QED! You have an appointment with the ophthalmologist to change your glasses.

Now you can move on! How many generations lost?

Obamot wrote:— what is it due to what [your paintings say]?

— why can't we manage to renew the populations in the “rich” countries to the point of needing an almost COMPULSORY recourse to immigration to make up for the demographic deficit?...

— And incidentally, what about the effect of the reintroduction of polio “thanks” to vaccinations (by Bill Gates and his Foundation)?

— Don't you have the global hospitalizations for 2020? Yes, that would be useful!
0 x
ABC2019
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 12927
Registration: 29/12/19, 11:58
x 1008

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by ABC2019 » 03/05/21, 19:06

Obamot wrote:And what did I say! You just sweetened the part that gets worse : Arrowd:

ah yes damn you're right, I don't think we're going to get a negative mortality as the linear extrapolation could have made us think... damn damn then.. : Shock:
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)

Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Obamot » 03/05/21, 19:18

I'm going to give you another view of things, the distribution of the world's population by age group:

449E6216-7BE0-4270-B998-2E2A451ACD9A.jpeg
449E6216-7BE0-4270-B998-2E2A451ACD9A.jpeg (127.5 Kio) Consulté 313 fois

And there we immediately understand something else! We see that there has been no increase in the birth rate for a while in the 0-5.
So there's a problem, the question I asked you, who will pay the pensions?

The effect of covid on mortality 0 to 5 years, it's more going to be that for 2020 (back 20 and more back or something

0EDF020B-63AD-450A-B9FC-B2A1C74DDD8B.jpeg
0EDF020B-63AD-450A-B9FC-B2A1C74DDD8B.jpeg (372.7 Kio) Consulté 313 fois

This is what the Codex must do a little bit distributed each year....

But you're there to say, "everything is fine it's under control“It will save billions of tons of Co2...
ABC2019 wrote:
Obamot wrote:And what did I say! You just sweetened the part that gets worse : Arrowd:

ah yes damn you're right, I don't think we're going to get a negative mortality as the linear extrapolation could have made us think... damn damn then.. : Shock:
Yes it's kon, nevertheless you tampered with the cursor so as not to have a curve that goes up "because we are not able to understand by ourselves that a mortality curve cannot go down to infinity, thenkon is trokons" :P

And hop, it still allows you to zap on the rest Mr. evasive! : Mrgreen:
Last edited by Obamot the 03 / 05 / 21, 19: 44, 2 edited once.
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9772
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by sicetaitsimple » 03/05/21, 19:38

Obamot wrote:Nevertheless, you tampered with the cursor so as not to have a curve that goes up


It's weird, I don't see it going back???? Are you sure it's not you who needs glasses?
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79111
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Christophe » 03/05/21, 20:25

sicetaitsimple wrote:
Obamot wrote:Nevertheless, you tampered with the cursor so as not to have a curve that goes up


It's weird, I don't see it going back???? Are you sure it's not you who needs glasses?


Tilt the graph!!

I had already given you the trick of Obamot a few days ago!! : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen: : Mrgreen:
1 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by Obamot » 03/05/21, 20:29

In the end, it's not that funny when we talk about infant mortality (6 children died every day due to lack of care monopolized by covid) and even less when an annual part is due to our junk food, bought with confidence by mothers, with blank check from the WHO and food standards supposed to protect populations!

Still no answer to that, huh, the subject obviously disturbs. So much the better.
Last edited by Obamot the 03 / 05 / 21, 20: 37, 1 edited once.
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9772
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by sicetaitsimple » 03/05/21, 20:33

Christophe wrote:
sicetaitsimple wrote:
It's weird, I don't see it going back???? Are you sure it's not you who needs glasses?

Tilt the graph!!
:


Ah yes, you are right! If we tilt the graph enough (but have to go anyway), it goes up!
0 x
User avatar
GuyGadeboisTheBack
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 14821
Registration: 10/12/20, 20:52
Location: 04
x 4301

Re: The CONS of Coronavirus




by GuyGadeboisTheBack » 03/05/21, 20:33

You can even put it upside down, it also works. : Mrgreen:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : Google [Bot] and 256 guests