pedrodelavega wrote:Obamot wrote:Pfffff... I didn't say the test didn't exist.
You said "
PCR never used in the case of influenza for 50 years"
you don't understand the difference between 2 verbs:
utiliser"VS"
to exist" (this is why you seek without finding) Kary Mullis, its inventor, never said that PCR would not be effective in detecting infectious diseases (otherwise he would have received the Nobel Prize for something that did not work) he had just explained why it was not necessary
not the utiliser for mass testing (which was therefore not the case until "
covid market segment".because it's all just a lucrative dark business of pharma.)
And deep down
your mystification consists in maintaining the confusion between mass tests (no they were not used for that, it's bullshit) and the fact that they exist as means of individual detection, in principle during a medical diagnosis .
pedrodelavega wrote:Obamot wrote:I was talking about the common flu*
link 2 and 3 also speak
no, your mystification remains, even while playing sea digger
2 ...or prove to us that there have been massive test campaigns, such as for the Covid, with mobile test units, screening campaign in order and all the rest. But there was none with the common flu.
We see that you still have it in your throat for having planted yourself for 2 years on the uncertainty of the results of the PCR on the Covid (when not certified by a medical diagnosis) which contributed to the decline of your credibility completely and demonstrated that you were content to copy/paste without really understanding the material (like all the "funny ones" of the "Comedy Club") in addition to having been unmasked as a mystifier by Remundo. Under different nicknames, you've been burned for 14 years as usual. (PB2487 PB2488, having lived in denial, without assuming yourself)
