Pandemic Coronavirus COVID-19: maps, statistics, analyzes and day-to-day information

[izentrop]

robob off topic

It's going up again...

[Obamot]

Screenshot_2023-03-12-03-49-20-49_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg (197.9 Kio) Consulté 652 fois

Coke?

We don't give a damn about your Nicolas Berrod, he's NOT on "Health transparency"

He therefore has no scientific training and his opinion counts for nothing.
Go get yourself an Izy verbena, is there a bridge near you?

[Janic]

the Berrod, like his a(l)colytes only survive on the mainstream BP media, otherwise they have no real existence! And it will be hard for them to fall back into anonymity, like all failures.

[reinoso]

robob off topic

It's going up again...

always equal to himself in misinformation!

doctissimo.jpg (52.5 Kio) Viewed 632 times

[Robob]

On the other hand Izy managed to divert attention perfectly and you all dove in answering her which drowns my very interesting message in the mass.

I am therefore obliged to submit this DREES study of December 2022 where it is written on the first line:

"In 2020, Covid-19 led to the death of 69 people in France (000% of deaths), which made it the third most important cause of death for this year. A little more than half of Covid-10,4 victims were 19 or older, with men who died of Covid-85 being younger on average than women."

Note it: "half of the victims of Covid-19 were 85 years or older".
35 deaths of little old women not taken care of because "there is no treatment", a little helped with Rivotril.

mortality DREES.jpg (95.98 KiB) Viewed 598 times

The small graph of the DREES where we can clearly see thatthere is no excess mortality in 2020 compared to 2015 (strong flu).
We also clearly see that all the other causes of death are down, compared to 2015 but also 2017, a year of low mortality.
Only a blind person cannot see that there is a quite obvious transfer of various mortalities into the covid box.
Most certainly thanks, among other things, to our famous ultra-sensitive PCR tests.

Reason why Izy throws you "Parisian". There, I highlighted, in bold with big letters to strike consciences and a stupid smiley to attract the audience:

[izentrop]

The pov robob who wants to do his little cooking when everything is in the header summary https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr ... 1250_0.pdf

If there are things you don't understand, ask the authors who will be happy to help you.

[Obamot]

We know all your old tricks to waste our time Izy-ment: no interest.

On the other hand Izy managed to divert attention perfectly and you all dove in answering her which drowns my very interesting message in the mass.

I am therefore obliged to submit this DREES study of December 2022 where it is written on the first line:

"In 2020, Covid-19 led to the death of 69 people in France (000% of deaths), which made it the third most important cause of death for this year. A little more than half of Covid-10,4 victims were 19 or older, with men who died of Covid-85 being younger on average than women."

Note it: "half of the victims of Covid-19 were 85 years or older".
35 deaths of little old women not taken care of because "there is no treatment", a little helped with Rivotril.

mortality DREES.jpg (95.98 KiB) Viewed 559 times

The small graph of the DREES where we can clearly see thatthere is no excess mortality in 2020 compared to 2015 (strong flu).
We also clearly see that all the other causes of death are down, compared to 2015 but also 2017, a year of low mortality.
Only a blind person cannot see that there is a quite obvious transfer of various mortalities into the covid box.
Most certainly thanks, among other things, to our famous ultra-sensitive PCR tests.

Reason why Izy throws you "Parisian". There, I highlighted, in bold with big letters to strike consciences and a stupid smiley to attract the audience:

No, in my opinion it won't ( )

[Janic]

and the izy, who doesn't even have his patent... except in bullshit, doesn't even know how to read what he underlines yet. Must say that the pseudo zététicons of his sect naz 'y facho, conspiracy, etc ... do not know much better.

[Obamot]

[•••] it's all in the header summary https://drees.solidarites-sante.gouv.fr ... 1250_0.pdf

As it says, see 'header summary'

IMG_20230313_101228.jpg (444.25 KB) Viewed times 525

“Insee staff "involved"" wow(*)

Puree the choice of verb, we walk on eggshells... That says a lot: isn't that what you do when you're muzzled by your hierarchy, you manage to make it understood and put it highlighted by insignificant details, and get by the tape: "content invalidation", and the pearl discovered by Robob seems to be one (even if, and for quite understandable reasons of wanting to cover the tracks by an administration that is too conciliatory with power, it does not appear immediately in the header), since in fact, these 'details' are revealing (as well as it would be well to base ourselves on the many times that INSEE and DREES have been caught in the act of covering up — deaths not correctly counted/reported/for obscure reasons — maybe I advance a little in the interpretation, but one day it will be necessary well to clarify all that for these administrations... Pierre Chaillot does it partly in his work he says.

For my part, without being too mistaken, I see other clues here. Let's stay vigilant and always check.

(*) (in the beginning was the verb)

[Janic]

(*) (in the beginning was the verb)
in this case rather verbiage!

verbiage
masculine noun
PEJORATIVE
Abundance of words, meaningless words or words that say little.
pure izmenteur!