Adrien:Here is the curve to which you were referring perhaps for Argentina, a mortality rate that it would be well to consolidate by relating it more precisely to the total number of hospitalizations to have a true fatality rate.
Pandemic Coronavirus COVID-19: maps, statistics, analyzes and day-to-day information
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
Obamot wrote:Adrien:Here is the curve to which you were referring perhaps for Argentina, a mortality rate that it would be well to consolidate by relating it more precisely to the total number of hospitalizations to have a true fatality rate.
A6448FF9-3C16-4E1A-B974-646A13AA9938.jpeg
To continue with the precision of the terms, CFR translates to apparent case fatality rate, the number of deaths per case tested positive, which as stated and as you point out is a poor measure of "risk of death. The" death rate " , it's something else, it's the number of deaths per capita, and it can only increase over time, unlike the case fatality rate. The positivity rate Adrien was talking about is something else again, this is the number of positive cases per case tested.
0 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
No, I read the word “mortality”On the board (and not“fatality") I suggested the meaning by answering that
according to a curve which would be relatively the result of the use of Ivermectin in Argentina ... and I will certainly not enter into yet another controversy in this regard, neither on that nor on the confusion of the terms used by the Anglo- Saxons! This is not the subject.Adrien (ex-nico239) in the Ivermectin thread wrote:On the other hand if someone sees a falling death curve in Argentina it's willingly
0 x
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
and I add: not “risk” but well rate = "rates" so you're still wrong
But as Remundo says in the other thread, it is the “orders of magnitude” that are important. So I stop there.
But as Remundo says in the other thread, it is the “orders of magnitude” that are important. So I stop there.
0 x
- Adrien (ex-nico239)
- Econologue expert
- posts: 9845
- Registration: 31/05/17, 15:43
- Location: 04
- x 2150
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
the passage on mutations is very interesting.
Didier RAOULT was more careful not long ago for the link between mutations and the weakening of the pathogenicity of the virus
this time he is more convinced.
Didier RAOULT was more careful not long ago for the link between mutations and the weakening of the pathogenicity of the virus
this time he is more convinced.
0 x
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 3791
- Registration: 09/03/13, 21:02
- x 1311
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
I don't get Raoult's comparison on Florida / Cuba:
Florida: 13316 deaths for 685431 cases -> Case fatality rate 1.9%
Cuba: 116 deaths for 5141 cases -> Case fatality rate 2.3%
Afterwards, Florida was much more affected but the incidence rate is linked to the preventive measures (barrier gestures, confinement, closure of entries into the country, masks, etc.). What does this have to do with HCQ?
Florida: 13316 deaths for 685431 cases -> Case fatality rate 1.9%
Cuba: 116 deaths for 5141 cases -> Case fatality rate 2.3%
Afterwards, Florida was much more affected but the incidence rate is linked to the preventive measures (barrier gestures, confinement, closure of entries into the country, masks, etc.). What does this have to do with HCQ?
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
Remundo wrote:Didier RAOULT was more careful not long ago for the link between mutations and the weakening of the pathogenicity of the virus
this time he is more convinced.
I read everything the other way around I don't know where a few days ago ... well, if we have to learn a lesson from this crisis it is that an information valid yesterday may not be valid today. yeah ...
We are off the hook, already I had trouble following the world before the coronavirus ... so now ... pffffuuuuu
1 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
Obamot wrote:: arrowd: and I add: not “risk” but well rate = "rates" so you're still wrong
0F88B685-7AF3-441B-95A7-DAA0576F7615.jpeg
But as Remundo says in the other thread, it is the “orders of magnitude” that are important. So I stop there.
this is an example of confusion that has already been pointed out, we often use "death rate" for "case fatality rate", but it is also used for the true death rate. This is why it is preferable to reserve mortality when we reduce to the total population, and lethality when we reduce to the number of cases, that leads to less confusion in the discussions.
1 x
To pass for an idiot in the eyes of a fool is a gourmet pleasure. (Georges COURTELINE)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
Mééé denies nui went to parties with 200 people and was not even sick moiiiiiii (Guignol des bois)
- Obamot
- Econologue expert
- posts: 28725
- Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
- Location: regio genevesis
- x 5538
Re: Coronavirus COVID-19, map of the epidemic in real time
Florida: 13316 deaths for 685431 case mass tested -> Rate of lethality 1.9% [= MORTALITY rate and not “lethality”]pedrodelavega wrote:I don't get Raoult's comparison on Florida / Cuba:
Florida: 13316 deaths for 685431 cases -> Case fatality rate 1.9%
Cuba: 116 deaths for 5141 cases -> Case fatality rate 2.3%
Afterwards, Florida was much more affected but the incidence rate is linked to the preventive measures (barrier gestures, confinement, closure of entries into the country, masks, etc.). What does this have to do with HCQ?
Without claiming to be categorical, you don't get it, because like ABC2019 you confuse everything. Your cases are the “tested” in total, not the hospitalizations. With the muddled mind that you have, how can you not have muddled reasoning?
So repeat the calculation with the total number of cumulative hospitalizations, to see ...
Will your confusion last a long time?
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 524 Replies
- 45137 views
-
Last message by gegyx
View the latest post
21/02/22, 11:26A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 90 Replies
- 15430 views
-
Last message by Macro
View the latest post
26/01/22, 09:34A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 20 Replies
- 8904 views
-
Last message by Paul72
View the latest post
25/09/20, 17:32A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 5 Replies
- 2972 views
-
Last message by Sylvester spiritus
View the latest post
09/08/20, 16:33A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
-
- 9548 Replies
- 1011221 views
-
Last message by gegyx
View the latest post
21/03/24, 14:43A subject posted in the forum : Health and prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental hazards
Back to "Health and Prevention. Pollution, causes and effects of environmental risks "
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 265 guests