izentrop wrote:Ah yes canceled but replaced https://www.boutique.afnor.org/norme/xp ... 2/fa102876
LOOOOOOOOL (twice) ... Poor Izy.
izentrop wrote:Ah yes canceled but replaced https://www.boutique.afnor.org/norme/xp ... 2/fa102876
izentrop wrote:Ok, but stop consuming these plants at the same time https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acide_caf ... es_plantes, because they also contain a carcinogenic substance 2BGuyGadebois wrote:Throw away your non-stick pans!
Studies on the carcinogenicity of caffeic acid have had mixed results. Some studies have shown that it inhibits carcinogenesis, and other experiments show carcinogenic effects. Oral administration of high doses of caffeic acid in rats has caused stomach papillomas. In the same study, high doses of combined antioxidants, including caffeic acid, showed a significant decrease in the growth of colon tumors in these same rats. No significant effect was noted elsewhere. Caffeic acid is listed under certain risk data sheets as a potential carcinogen, as it has been classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a group 2B carcinogen ("possibly carcinogenic to humans"). . More recent data indicate that bacteria in the bowels of rats can alter the formation of caffeic acid metabolites. Other than caffeic acid being an antagonistic thiamine (antithiamine factor), there have been no known bad effects of caffeic acid in humans. In addition, caffeic acid treatment attenuated LPS-induced disease behavior in experimental animals by decreasing peripheral and central cytokine levels as well as oxidative stress caused by LPS.
Food preparations designed with a dose of engine oil mixed with sunflower oil
13th legislature
Written question n ° 04583 by Mr. Adrien Gouteyron (Haute-Loire - UMP)
published in the Senate 29 / 05 / 2008 - 1041 page
Mr. Adrien Gouteyron draws the attention of the Minister of Health, Youth, Sports and Community Life to the recent scandal of food preparations which have been conceived with a dose of engine oil mixed with l classic sunflower oil. He reminded her that the lubricant, mixed with a batch of 40 tonnes of sunflower oil, was used to prepare an unknown number of products that had never been removed from French shelves. Preparations such as industrial salad dressing, canned oil and other ready meals would have been designed with a dose of motor oil mixed with classic sunflower oil. It appears that the affair began in late February when the number one oilseed processing company received a shipment of 000 tonnes of crude sunflower oil from Ukraine at its plant. A cargo itself from a 2-ton batch also delivered to the Netherlands, Italy and Spain. A month later, the company was informed by an industrialist from northern Europe, recipient of the same batch, of the presence of motor oil mixed with sunflower oil. On April 800, one month after being informed of the problem, and two months after receiving adulterated oil, the said company finally informed the French Directorate General for Competition, Consumption and the Suppression of Fraud (DGCCRF). According to several newspapers, 40 of the 000 tonnes of oil delivered to Sète are in fact motor oil and not sunflower oil. Warned, the Fraud Repression and the European Commission launch an alert and remove the products from the shelves. Products which, they say, have not reached the consumer. At least that is what they assert at first. Because in reality, neither the DGCCRF, nor Brussels know how much product has been contaminated. Also, on May 21, the European Commission produced a recommendation authorizing the sale of all foods containing less than 19% adulterated oil. He therefore asked him on the one hand if all the precautions had been taken so that the health of the consumer was not threatened and, on the other hand, how the Government intended to strengthen the means of control so that such a case would not happen again more.
Response from the Ministry of Health, Youth, Sports and Community Life
published in the Senate 30 / 10 / 2008 - 2188 page
The contamination with mineral oil of 2 tonnes of crude sunflower oils imported from Ukraine resulted in the marketing, between February 800 and April 28, 4, of 2008 tonnes of contaminated refined oils. These oils have been marketed directly or incorporated into various foodstuffs (preserves, sauces, etc.). Foodstuffs containing more than 4% of contaminated oils have been withdrawn from distribution. For oils and foodstuffs containing less than 10% of contaminated oils, scientific and technical support was requested from the French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA), in order to assess the level of potential exposure of French consumers and thus assess the risk to their health. The Agency has carried out an assessment of the potential exposure of the consumer through the consumption of contaminated oil but also of all the foodstuffs incorporating oil in their compositions. AFSSA used the most pessimistic exposure scenario possible (maximum scenario), that is to say one in which the consumption of oil and products based on contaminated oil would be maximum. It follows, for the most critical case, of a child who consumes a lot, that the consumption of these foodstuffs and oils represents at most 7,5% of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) in mineral oils. The ADI is the quantity of a substance that an individual can ingest daily, throughout his life, without appreciable risk for health. This contamination therefore posed a risk considered negligible for consumers. The French government intends, however, to propose, during the French presidency of the European Union, appropriate measures aimed at ensuring a high level of health protection when importing products into the European Union. Thus, a memorandum was presented to the Agriculture Council on June 23, 2008. It has three axes: continuous improvement of import controls, carrying out a complete analysis of import sanitary and phytosanitary risks and the means take into account collective European preferences in international trade. A working group is responsible for proposing an action plan and possible areas for improvement during the Council of Ministers of Agriculture on December 17-19, 2008.
GuyGadebois wrote:... It follows, for the most critical case, of a child who consumes a lot, that the consumption of these foodstuffs and oils represents a maximum of 7,5% of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) in mineral oils. The ADI is the amount of a substance that an individual can ingest daily, throughout his life, without appreciable risk to health. This contamination therefore posed a risk considered negligible for consumers. [/ size]
Exnihiloest wrote:GuyGadebois wrote:... It follows, for the most critical case, of a child who consumes a lot, that the consumption of these foodstuffs and oils represents a maximum of 7,5% of the acceptable daily intake (ADI) in mineral oils. The ADI is the amount of a substance that an individual can ingest daily, throughout his life, without appreciable risk to health. This contamination therefore posed a risk considered negligible for consumers. [/ size]
A whole anti-industrial blunder for nothing, after all.
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:...
Well let's see ... he is happy Tryphon to buy and eat shit ... in addition, he believes in the bullshit that can tell the Ministry of health, youth, sports and associative life .. Specialists in toxicology. How sad...
Back to "humanitarian disasters, natural, climatic and industrial"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 85 guests