this has been the case for a long time. Reread the previous testimonies! The omerta of your friends does not prevent reality from existing. Also re-read all the failures of your supposed scientific medicine like for cancers, heart diseases, there it is a huge acknowledgment of failure and you are too conditioned by your sects to realize it.The day homeopathy has the same cure rates as science-based medicine, we will talk about it again ....
so one more:
Know how to change your mind when faced with the evidence of the effectiveness of homeopathy
Home> News ...> Know How to change your mind in the face of the evidence of the effectiveness of homeopathy
November 29, 2019
“No efficacy of homeopathy is scientifically proven”…
This was affirmed by the Academies of Medicine and Pharmacy, on March 26, 2019, by ruling on the one hand against the reimbursement of homeopathic specialties, but also against the teaching of this discipline in the Faculties of Medicine and of pharmacy.
This makes me want to tell you a TRUE little story. It is narrated by Pierre Lance, journalist and writer, who has long pointed the finger at the “forbidden discoveries” in his famous works: “Cursed scholars, excluded researchers”.
Obviously a drug which no longer contains the slightest atom of the original substance can have no effect on any pathology; at first it seems logical! But this is to ignore the basics of experimental medicine set out by Claude Bernard and which can be summarized as follows: "Before the facts, the theory must bow." but where are the facts? I come back to my story: it is that of Professor Jean-Claude CAZIN, who was dean of the Faculty of Pharmacy in Lille. He was a priori very hostile to Homeopathy. But he demonstrated an intellectual honesty that we would like to meet more often with our dominant scholars ; he has completely changed his opinion, following experiments carried out with the greatest rigor. Professor Cazin wanted to counter the results of a study communicated by BOIRON which had been the subject of a publication published in the medical press and which scandalized him; it was about an experiment carried out on rats, and which established the effectiveness of the remedy Phosphorus in 9ch in case of cirrhosis and of the remedy Arsenicum album 9ch in case of poisoning by arsenic. In order to confuse the authors of the study, he had the experiment carried out in his own laboratory. The protocol to follow was as follows: a group of rats is given a lethal dose of arsenic; then only half of the rats receive Arsenicum. Some time later, the person who had carried out the protocol came to explain to Pf Cazin that after having repeated the experiment several times he had to face the facts: the only surviving rats were those who had received the homeopathic remedy. And it is here that we measure the strength of a prejudice when it has colonized a spirit. Dean Cazin could not accept the reality of this result and convinced himself that Boiron had bribed his laboratory assistant. So he decided to have the experiment started again by his laboratory chief. A few weeks later, the latter communicated the results to him and they were identical to those obtained by the previous experimenter. Always incredulous, Pf Cazin then decided to carry out the experiments himself, but the results were the same, not all rats treated with homeopathy died. Trapped in his prejudice that a homeopathic remedy cannot be effective, Dean Cazin preferred to imagine an incredible intrusion in his laboratory. He therefore changed the locks of the room, keeping the keys with him day and night, so that no one could access the rats; then he carried out the experiment himself ... and the result was obviously similar to the previous ones: homeopathy saved rats, impossible to deny the evidence ! An honest man, Dean Cazin finally surrendered and threw his prejudice into the nettles. He decided to encourage the development of a university diploma in homeopathy at the Faculty of Lille, the first Faculty to take this initiative, thereby creating a precedent which encouraged Strasbourg, then Monpellier and others to follow the same path. The veracity of this story is confirmed to us by Francine Drieu (pharmacist and HSF trainer) who herself has taught for many years at the Faculty of Lille and has well known Dean Cazin and his broad openness. Professor Cazin (who died in 2011) has been replaced for a long time and the new authorities of the Faculty of Medicine of Lille announced last fall that they were suspending the university diploma in homeopathy which had existed for forty years! This created a new "precedent" which led the other Faculties to do the same. would the new generations of rats have become insensitive to Arsenicum? Should we consider that prejudices die hard? Some even say that prejudice never dies! Or would other mobiles not be in play? Who benefits from the crime? I would like to be wrong, but I sadly think today that the decisions explained at the beginning from our high health authorities very slowly announce the complete ban on teaching and even using Homeopathy.
Dr. Christine Arnoux
