Exnihiloest wrote:
Antibiotics don't attack viruses, yes. But the "die" is the "die", not especially the flu but the catch-all that we familiarly use to store all our little plagues, pulmonary infection, angina, bronchitis ...
A third of nasopharyngitis, tonsillitis and other acute bronchitis are bacterial, but it seems to me that antibiotics are no longer given. Someone here saw his doctor offer him the rapid diagnostic test to find out if his angina is of bacterial origin or not? It is possible that practices have changed in recent years, I am lucky not to see my doctor often.
Wow! The page before I wrote: "Except when it comes to viruses and the doctor systematically prescribes an antibiotic (therefore ineffective) based only on symptoms and not on an analysis".
And you said, "Unnecessary use is another problem.
The problem is that we ALSO reduce the use of antibiotics where they are useful (without being vital), that's what I said.
The amalgamation of the two questions without distinction, it's nonsense. "
And there you advance that 2/3 of the "crèves" are of viral origin .... So YES the useless use was indeed a problem. Problem which directly led us to multi-antibiotic resistance whose reality is indisputable.
But "the distinguo" is for grandpa, the others are dummies.
