Exnihiloest wrote:Paying farmers to put carbon back into the soil would therefore be one of these useless measures impoverishing everyone except perhaps farmers, and penalizing the sectors where there is a real need for a redistribution of wealth. Definitely to avoid.
I understand that if we think that increasing the rate of CO2 in the atmosphere is a benefit, there is no particular interest in remunerating farmers for storing it in the soil, except possibly to make certain soils more correct characteristics, but we could say in this case that it is above all their problem ..... I noted your opinion.
So we are going to pose a hypothesis for the rest, it is that indeed we have more to gain than to lose by limiting the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. It is a hypothesis, it seems all the same that it collects some favorable scientific opinions .....
Those who do not agree with the hypothesis go on another thread, the others discuss the subject,