CO2 and the reality of the greenhouse effect

[steurches]

CO2 is a very intelligent gas, it only lets solar radiation pass in the direction Space -> Earth and blocks it in the direction Earth -> Space.
Professor Benvénitse should look into it, this is the source of a promising future omeopathic medicine.
We still don't know where his remarkable intelligence comes from. (no doubt much higher than a majority of humans)
but there is no risk of knowing one day since we do not seek ...
we do like sheep ... we accept it and bleat ...

[izentrop]

Professor Benvénitse should look into it

He no longer risks, the poor https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Benveniste
For the rest, maybe the answer here https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php

[eclectron]

CO2 is a very intelligent gas, it only lets solar radiation pass in the direction Space -> Earth and blocks it in the direction Earth -> Space.
Professor Benvénitse should look into it, this is the source of a promising future omeopathic medicine.
We still don't know where his remarkable intelligence comes from. (no doubt much higher than a majority of humans)
but there is no risk of knowing one day since we do not seek ...
we do like sheep ... we accept it and bleat ...

Well tried but not, CO2, like any gas, is not intelligent.
Furthermore, it is not only CO2 that is responsible for global warming.

We should already find out how the greenhouse effect works:
http://www.meteofrance.fr/climat-passe- ... mecanismes

Basically, the gas lets in light. On contact with the ground, the light is converted into infrared (heat) and the gas does not allow this infrared to pass through well, but always the light as well.
So the energy passes in one direction but less well in the other, because the energy has changed wavelength in the return direction.

[izentrop]

Basically, I agree, eclectron, but the light is not actually converted, it is because the thermal energy emitted by a body does not have the same wavelength depending on its temperature. Your definition is good, it's just the word "converted" that I don't find the best choice ... but it comes down to the same thing.

For example: the energy received from the sun is done to the maximum in the yellow, while that re-emitted by the warmed ground, is done mainly in the infrared, hence the explanation

There are gases (“greenhouse gases”) present in our atmosphere, present in small quantities, which play for our planet exactly the same role as the windows of the greenhouse in the example above. These gases do not prevent sunlight from reaching us (they are very transparent to solar radiation), but prevent infrared radiation emitted by the ground from returning to space. They thus act as a "cover" by trapping, in a way, the energy - therefore a high temperature - near the ground. https://jancovici.com/changement-climat ... -de-serre/

https://www.futura-sciences.com/science ... 3/page/13/

[moinsdewatt]

steurches is a big troll that the moderators of this forum.

[Janic]

Professor Benvénitse should look into it, this is the source of a promising future omeopathic medicine.

benveniste died and his work on the memory of water resumed, in part by Montagnier, the discoverer of HIV and climbed to the skies, then lowered lower than earth by leaving the ruts of good thinking.
"And yet it moves" there too!

[Exnihiloest]

Much is made of climate "sensitivity". Too much CO2, and there would be a point of no return and thermal runaway on the planet.
This study shows the opposite:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10 ... 19.1699387
"At CO2 concentrations greater than four times the pre-industrial value, climate sensitivity decreases to almost zero following episodes of global cooling as large as 10 K."

[Christophe]

You still there ?

"At CO2 concentrations greater than four times the pre-industrial value, climate sensitivity decreases to almost zero following episodes of global cooling as large as 10 K."

Another highly speculative sentence!

What does "climate sensitivity" mean?

And we are far from being 4 times the pre-industrial value, we are not even at double (560 ppm is double).

Between the two there is the climate pressure cooker that awaits us!

Between the 2 there is perhaps the destruction of all terrestrial animal life (the bottom of the oceans should be less impacted) ... therefore necessarily warming will no longer be a problem after 1160 ppm ...

In short of the big anything!

[GuyGadebois]

In short of the big anything!

To not change ...

[Exnihiloest]

I pointed to a study, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10 ... 19.1699387, just read it, not look at the finger showing it or just a quote.
If we do not know what climate sensitivity is, BABA in climatology, the questions of CO2 and global warming will remain out of reach of those who do not plan to make the effort to understand it, by educating themselves- same outside forums using specialized educational sites.