Nuclear and carbon: what releases in CO2 / kWh? Figures PWC, EdF, ADEME, Stanford ...

[moinsdewatt]

Well yes, it was in 2015 when there was more use of oil and coal thermal power plants. It's almost in the past.

Too bad EDF had to close Fessenheim to please a few ecologists who understand nothing.

[Christophe]

Well yes, it was dated 2015 date when there was more use of oil and coal thermal power plants. It's almost in the past.

Too bad EDF had to close Fessenheim to please a few ecologists who understand nothing.

Uh isn't there a slight contradiction there?

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

To close a power station which multiplied the incidents and whose closing was planned, it is to please the ecologists who understand nothing. Because the other ....... he understands everything and would have preferred "a good Chernobyl" with us, just to show them, to these ecologists!

[Exnihiloest]

Belgium is the only country in Europe that plans to increase its CO2 emissions per KWh ... the cons ... although France has started on the same slope of ever more CO2 ...

Excellent news. It would indeed be silly to plague the economy because of a ridiculous doomsday prediction by climastrologists. We know that when they expire, none of their past predictions matched the measurements.

However, even if there is no reason to eliminate CO2, nuclear power remains the best suited energy, both to our energy and ecological needs and to our financial constraints. Burning coal, or ransacking landscapes with non-recyclable wind turbines whose concrete bases will remain in the ground forever, is the stupid devastation perpetrated by ecologism, today at the boot of the so-called green industry. .

[Christophe]

Excellent news. It would indeed be silly to plague the economy because of a ridiculous doomsday prediction of climastrologers. We know that when they expire, none of their past predictions did not agree with the measurements.

Why do you think the dinosaurs were so big?