Moindreffor wrote: others before you said, let's throw in the sea it's huge ...
I'll make the effort to stay polite, but it costs me.
Having a 4x4 in town pollutes, it's ridiculous. We agree. Fine particle pollution in cities is not (little) absorbed by concrete or tarred soil or by the walls of buildings. On the contrary, each passing vehicle puts them back in suspension, it is an infernal circle that causes smog. On the contrary, in the countryside, when the fine particles end up settling on the ground, they are absorbed, stick to plants, are destroyed by natural processes. So no, we can not compare or make the amalgam that you made from the start.
"I wouldn't want to repeat the debate on hunting" but
these drunk assassins hunters pollute much more with their pellets, their nut pick-ups and the shit they leave in the wild (cans, sockets, plastic bags, etc.) than people who use wood and have modern equipment with double combustion.
Ps: I reported sicetaitchou to moderation.
“It is better to mobilize your intelligence on bullshit than to mobilize your bullshit on intelligent things. (J.Rouxel)
"By definition the cause is the product of the effect". (Tryphion)
"360 / 000 / 0,5 is 100 million and not 72 million" (AVC)