janic wrote: So if an electrician wants to make an efficiency comparison between an electrical installation to supply current and a mechanical installation with its chains, pulleys and sprockets' (and even if the two can be complementary) none of the criteria of one is applicable to the other.
It doesn't mean anything: We can very well compare and verify the efficiency of a car and an electric car with the same criteria (speed, performance, pollution, range, noise, etc.). Or compare the efficiency, the power of a thermal and electric motor.
I suspected as I wrote this above, that while holding out the pole there would be someone to grab it and it did not fail!
Now READ CAREFULLY
what is underlined, you should have seen it: no?
So I did not compare the efficiency as to the result that can be obtained by each technique, but only the criterion that an electrician whose skills are in this matter and a mechanic who has skills in another field
and where none of the criteria is applicable to the other. Clearly an allopath is… an allopath! and a homeopath is… a homeopath! How weird or rather basic, it's called a text analysis!
And as you (or your alter ego) will inevitably say that an electrician can have knowledge of mechanics and actually make a product combining the two skills.
Well yes! This is what is actually the case for H doctors who first studied allopathy, plus additional studies in homeopathy and can reconcile the two disciplines.
But this is not the case for graduates only from allopathy , but who want to pretend they know what they haven't studied. So they don't know anything about it,
they are incompetent! You finally perceive the nuance! (Finally, I hope!)
But hey, it's classic speech: "When the measured temperature is not good, it is necessarily the fault of the thermometer, etc etc etc ... and this big global big-pharma plot etc etc etc etc .... "
What is classic is that the more someone ignores a subject, the more they want to pretend that they know it. "
Vanity of vanities "But your sentence can also be formulated thus with a small modification"
When the temperature cannot be measured for lack of a thermometer, it is necessarily the fault of the temperature »And other similar construction which does not mean anything intelligent.
Finally for the big global plot of big pharma, it is the same barrel as talking about a plot by oil tankers, a nuclear plot or any other supposed plot. It is not a question of conspiracy, but of business, big money, dollars, euros, money, blur, spikes, pèze, etc ... blackmail at work, Ahmed speaks better than me. And so when a company must defend its bottom of trade, it acts according to its immediate interests (more than 1.000 billion), more than those of its customers. If tomorrow H could collect as much money as A, all industries would get involved and forget, as if by chance, their diatribes on H because of this new Eldorado that would appear.
This is likely to happen in the long term, given the (relative) speed at which it is currently spreading and there is money to be made, which India has understood. It should remind some of this "prophecy" of Alain Peyrefitte "
when China wakes up ... the world will tremble"and she awoke awake and the world shook and we bite our fingers for not anticipating it.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré