ABC2019 »26/02/20, 16:53
janic wrote: precisely, you don't know, so find out from the right sources!
Janic's good sources are like the priest John of the Middle Ages. It is believed to exist, but no one knows where
Especially when one refuses to look for the obvious.
yes yes and the inside of the Moon is made of fromage blanc. It is obvious, and the evidence is plentiful and available on the internet, but I will not tire of giving it to you, if you refuse to look for it on the right sources
especially since I don't care, I'm VGL
quote] janic wrote: Now obviously, this "alternative" medicine is not included in the statistics of conventional medicine. So you won't find anything with them, that goes without saying.
I am talking to you about statistics of reductions in mortality due to diseases, that does not prejudge the reasons, "conventional" or "unconventional", and I do not limit my information. What diseases have strongly regressed thanks to homeopathy then according to homeopaths? [/ Quote] [quote
everything is in their literature obviously, since they are not admitted in A. literature, in France !!!!
ah yes it's true all the information exists and if you don't give it it's just so you don't get tired !!! [/ quote] exactly! but he's a smart guy
About how much? Considering the only one you mentioned, you shouldn't have sprained your wrist!
you know you are tiring?
Yes, but tireless!
ah that's it i found one !!
Well done, when we search, we end up finding ... finally!
http://www.homeopathie-francaise.com/in ... e-grenoble
This article reported on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed in the pediatric surgery department with 50 children. It showed that the drug Aconit in homeopathic dilution (4CH) was effective on postoperative agitation in a very significant way (95% of good results with Aconit against 30% with the placebo). Contrary to what critics claim, there are therefore convincing controlled studies in favor of the effectiveness of homeopathy. Science is discreet, but it is indisputable.so finally double-blind studies do exist, and are very useful to prove the effectiveness of homeopathy,
Of course, as this article reminds us, it would even be H who "invented" it.
unlike everything you've claimed so far?
one more fantasy, I never said that, but this:
a) From memory I said that the percentage of placebos was similar whatever the applied medicine; H like A or others.
b) It was not necessary to compare only H versus placebo, but
all three AT THE SAME TIME, on the same patients, alternatively etc ... otherwise it gives its last passage precisely.
But you are progressing!
You see, when you want, you can! and without me!
Except for something that's also what I wrote right here. If you are interested I can highlight the matches and especially the last part.
Janic wrote:
I have given you at least two which are professional reference organizations.
Ah yes? so here excuse me, in all your verbiage where you kept saying that it was not your job, I missed the place where you gave them to me !! can you give them back to me please?
given that you answered it right after, is that you had read it well! so search again, I'm not your boy!
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
