The homeopathy explained metaphorically for Dummies

[izentrop]

Hello,
You are perfectly right Gébé for the conspiracy and not to try to convince him.
I know it very well, but it is a game to seek the scientific argument sourced to counter its bad time.

It doesn't work, but at least it allows me to educate myself at the same time and give controversy to the passing reader like you. ;)

Critical, he doesn't know what that means, Janic.

Zetetics in forum was neglected for social networks. It took a while to adapt but now there are people on https://www.facebook.com/groups/zetetique/, whose strict rules are well enforced by effective moderation.
We should teach it in school.

[Janic]

Hello,
You are perfectly right Gébé for the conspiracy and not to try to convince him.
I know it very well, but it is a game to seek the scientific argument sourced to counter its bad time.

You have a flash of intelligence!

It doesn't work, but at least it allows me to educate myself at the same time and give controversy to the passing reader like you. ;)

Well here at least you will not die silly, failing to answer the false questions that you utter regularly.

Critical, he doesn't know what that means, Janic.

Ouarf! I am laughing! you are badly placed for that!

Zetetics in forum was neglected for social networks. It took a while to adapt but now there are people on https://www.facebook.com/groups/zetetique/, whose strict rules are well enforced by effective moderation.
We should teach it in school.

And paf, immediate proselytism, you're going to cause conscience problems to gebé

[Gébé]

It doesn't work, but at least it allows me to educate myself at the same time and give controversy to the passing reader like you. ;)

It is indeed very useful, some are doing it too. It takes a lot of courage !!! That I do not have

[Janic]

Gebe bonjour

It is indeed very useful, some are doing it too. It takes a lot of courage !!! That I do not have.

It is not a question of courage, but of wanting to know! Certainly it is much easier to bury your head in the sand and say nothing, see nothing, hear nothing. And also to despise high scientific authorities who warn populations against vaccine abuse. Leading figures like Professor Joyeux, renowned cancerologist, Professor Belpomme, another renowned cancerologist, Professor Even, Debré and others who are for vaccines, not for abuse, have gathered more than 2.000.000 signatures to protest these abuses (which is a performance in itself) and largely reached the quota to obtain a referendum of popular initiative, in America for example, at least in theory

https://professeur-joyeux.com/penser-vaccins/

For other vaccinations, a distinction is made between “compulsory” and “recommended”
I would first remind you that in September 2014, the Technical Council for Vaccination recommended that the obligation to vaccinate against Diphtheria-Tetanus-Poliomyelitis (DTP) be lifted. (the conspirators in question of Isentrop who knows much more than this advice, obviously?)

AFP
REFERENDUM - It was a presidential instruction. The two bills on the popular initiative referendum promised by François Hollande obtained the green light from Parliament this Thursday, November 21, making it theoretically possible to organize a consultation on the initiative of the citizens. Repairing an oversight from the previous five-year period that had enshrined this emblematic device in the Constitution without passing the implementing law that would make it possible.
Already voted on Tuesday in the Assembly, the two texts were approved by the senators by 326 votes for, while the 20 senators of the communist, republican and citizen group (CRC) voted against.
On paper, a new right is therefore now open to French citizens: "on the initiative of a fifth of the members of Parliament", a bill may be submitted to a popular consultation and must obtain the support of a " tenth of the voters "to prevail in the legislative calendar. If the Parliament does not take up the matter within a time limit which remains to be defined, the President of the Republic is then required to call a referendum.
A chance for the defenders of the right to vote of the foreigners who militate (in vain) for a constitutional revision? Not at all. Because the scenario of a referendum of popular initiative "will probably never happen", warns the socialist president of the Committee on Laws in the Assembly, Jean-Jacques Urvoas. "

It is so much easier to veil your face on the billions of profits made on the back of the SS and which will be distributed to large shareholders like l'Oréal or the oil group Total. Not to want to know that Bill Gates has redone his virginity by his foundation which vaccines with all arms. While (oh, my god what gossip) it is mainly to withdraw the sum from his taxable profits and also regain his "humanitarian" investment in share income he owns in the pharmaceutical industries. Money turns, because business is business.
to refuse to see the fate of the many victims of vaccines abandoned to their fate by the State which takes responsibility when compulsory and optional vaccines are mixed and therefore that the parents, who have trusted the system, have only their eyes for cry.
But with the full powers that the new president has attributed to himself, life will be less rosy until it gets in his face as with all totalitarian systems.

NB: as you are fully committed to vaccines, I therefore assume that your wife is against it!

[izentrop]

No change, complete and irrelevant disinformation, nothing to add.

PS: Courage, not really and that prevents me from doing something more useful.

[Janic]

No change, complete and off topic disinformation, nothing to add

more and more funny!
Always this mania to take an entire scientific elite for fools. It is true that compared to itself, they do not stand the comparison.

[Gébé]

Gebe bonjour

It is indeed very useful, some are doing it too. It takes a lot of courage !!! That I do not have.

It is not a question of courage, but of wanting to know! Certainly it is much easier to bury your head in the sand and say nothing, see nothing, hear nothing. And also to despise high scientific authorities who warn populations against vaccine abuse. Leading figures like Professor Joyeux, renowned cancerologist, Professor Belpomme, another renowned cancerologist, Professor Even, Debré and others who are for vaccines, not for abuse, have gathered more than 2.000.000 signatures to protest these abuses (which is a performance in itself) and largely reached the quota to obtain a referendum of popular initiative, in America for example, at least in theory

https://professeur-joyeux.com/penser-vaccins/

For other vaccinations, a distinction is made between “compulsory” and “recommended”
I would first remind you that in September 2014, the Technical Council for Vaccination recommended that the obligation to vaccinate against Diphtheria-Tetanus-Poliomyelitis (DTP) be lifted. (the conspirators in question of Isentrop who knows much more than this advice, obviously?)

AFP
REFERENDUM - It was a presidential instruction. The two bills on the popular initiative referendum promised by François Hollande obtained the green light from Parliament this Thursday, November 21, making it theoretically possible to organize a consultation on the initiative of the citizens. Repairing an oversight from the previous five-year period that had enshrined this emblematic device in the Constitution without passing the implementing law that would make it possible.
Already voted on Tuesday in the Assembly, the two texts were approved by the senators by 326 votes for, while the 20 senators of the communist, republican and citizen group (CRC) voted against.
On paper, a new right is therefore now open to French citizens: "on the initiative of a fifth of the members of Parliament", a bill may be submitted to a popular consultation and must obtain the support of a " tenth of the voters "to prevail in the legislative calendar. If the Parliament does not take up the matter within a time limit which remains to be defined, the President of the Republic is then required to call a referendum.
A chance for the defenders of the right to vote of the foreigners who militate (in vain) for a constitutional revision? Not at all. Because the scenario of a referendum of popular initiative "will probably never happen", warns the socialist president of the Committee on Laws in the Assembly, Jean-Jacques Urvoas. "

It is so much easier to veil your face on the billions of profits made on the back of the SS and which will be distributed to large shareholders like l'Oréal or the oil group Total. Not to want to know that Bill Gates has redone his virginity by his foundation which vaccines with all arms. While (oh, my god what gossip) it is mainly to withdraw the sum from his taxable profits and also regain his "humanitarian" investment in share income he owns in the pharmaceutical industries. Money turns, because business is business.
to refuse to see the fate of the many victims of vaccines abandoned to their fate by the State which takes responsibility when compulsory and optional vaccines are mixed and therefore that the parents, who have trusted the system, have only their eyes for cry.
But with the full powers that the new president has attributed to himself, life will be less rosy until it gets in his face as with all totalitarian systems.

NB: as you are fully committed to vaccines, I therefore assume that your wife is against it!

Sorry janic but since I know that conspiracy is contagious and that once infected there is no really effective treatment, I got vaccinated.
PS: Pull yourself together, there you are on a subject on homeopathy that you initiated yourself

[Janic]

Gébé

Sorry janic but since I know that conspiracy is contagious and that once infected there is no really effective treatment, I got vaccinated.

you are therefore hopelessly contaminated by conspiracy: poor of you!

PS: Pull yourself together, there you are on a subject on homeopathy that you initiated yourself

I would find it difficult to pull myself together when I saw a good boy get caught up in the usual fallacies of a zetetic man.
For the subject, itself, you were yourself on the subject of vaccines, but if homeopathy interests you, same thing ask the professionals of this profession, there are almost everywhere in France.

[Gébé]

if you are interested in homeopathy, the same thing, ask the professionals of this profession, there are some everywhere in France.

Good idea, as long as I am there I will also ask my baker if I should eat bread and my butcher if I should eat beef !!! In fact, I still have a little idea of ​​the answers.

[Janic]

Janic wrote:
if you are interested in homeopathy, the same thing, ask the professionals of this profession, there are some everywhere in France.

Good idea, as long as I am there I will also ask my baker if I should eat bread and my butcher if I should eat beef !!! In fact, I still have a little idea of ​​the answers.

I have lots of great ideas like that.
However, the French language has its grammar and sentence construction rules.
You should have said: "if you are interested in the butcher shop you will find information from the butcher, not from a baker, "and not whether you can eat it! Learning about a subject does not mean practicing it, but it is from the specialist that you will get the best answers: no?
At the same time, take the opportunity to learn about the meaning exact conspiratorial so as not to use it against the grain.