sen-no-sen wrote:We are therefore moving more and more towards an ultra-liberal model where only people able to adapt very quickly to changes will have "the chance to get out" according to the expression devoted ...
We can obviously conclude that all of this will not lead to more social peace, and clash will result, with perhaps parallel (but legal) economies as an adjustment variable.
* There is another method:the war...
I lost the answer I started ...
In short, it seems obvious to me that a transition must take place in society: the place of the master: money, or finance.
it is not the man who must yield, money is only a tool.
What good could a 100% automated economy, 100% efficient, 100% profitable and on the other hand men and women 100% useless and cannonballs?
While at the bottom, in theory and in dreams that we have long forgotten, the economy is there to bring happiness
At least one wellness ...
On the economy, the transition is also painful ... but not impossible.
The physical limitations to this dream remain, in my opinion, energy resources first, then resources in general.
Although we may be soberly happy.
For the rest, the place of money, the choices of society, the decision is ours (in theory). We must not forget it and give in so easily while resigning ourselves.