The non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?

Oil, gas, coal, nuclear (PWR, EPR, hot fusion, ITER), gas and coal thermal power plants, cogeneration, tri-generation. Peakoil, depletion, economics, technologies and geopolitical strategies. Prices, pollution, economic and social costs ...
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by sicetaitsimple » 18/10/19, 21:03

Janic wrote:it looks like a lesson well learned by heart and repeated to envy.


Coming from you, "repeat at will" makes sense!

That said, if you look a bit at the world map of emissions from the electricity sector that I posted above, we understand normally (if we have some neurons that still work) that it is certainly not in France that the deployment wind or solar is the most efficient.
0 x
User avatar
Remundo
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 15995
Registration: 15/10/07, 16:05
Location: Clermont Ferrand
x 5189

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by Remundo » 19/10/19, 07:55

for information, the correct spelling is: repeat at will

WITHOUT "e" at the end : Twisted:
0 x
Image
User avatar
Did67
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 20362
Registration: 20/01/08, 16:34
Location: Alsace
x 8685

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by Did67 » 19/10/19, 10:24

to be chafoin wrote:
Did67 wrote:(So ​​I'm not aiming for autonomy ... In accordance with my general philosophy: independence, great attention to balance sheets / cycles, but not autonomy)
What do you call "independence"?


There is a small distinction between independence and autonomy.

Autonomy is: you produce; you are all alone and therefore self-sufficient on your own ".

Independence is not depending - a balanced exchange, when you retain the ability to do, is a form of independence.

x: you do this well (grow garlic), better than me but you don't do that (grow parsley), which I do better, me on my side; if neither of the two, for an x ​​or y reason (you have a weapon that you are pointing at me!), dominates the other, we can consider "balanced exchanges"; if I keep the ability to make garlic if I wanted (I know how to do it, by making less parsley, I have room for garlic), I remain independent, while not making garlic at instant t ...
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by sicetaitsimple » 19/10/19, 10:59

Remundo wrote:for information, the correct spelling is: repeat at will
WITHOUT "e" at the end : Twisted:


Thank you! I did not know it, and I must not be the only one.
1 x
izentrop
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 13644
Registration: 17/03/14, 23:42
Location: picardie
x 1502
Contact :

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by izentrop » 19/10/19, 11:58

sicetaitsimple wrote:
Janic wrote:it looks like a lesson well learned by heart and repeated to envy.
Coming from you, "repeat at will" makes sense!

That said, if you look a bit at the world map of emissions from the electricity sector that I posted above, we understand normally (if we have some neurons that still work) that it is certainly not in France that the deployment wind or solar is the most efficient.
In this case it is spelled correctly if we translate the desire to disguise which makes sense by drowning the forum of text without tail or head, as in the subjects where he incenses charlatans responsible for the deaths of men by their misinformation. : Evil:
0 x
User avatar
to be chafoin
Grand Econologue
Grand Econologue
posts: 1202
Registration: 20/05/18, 23:11
Location: Gironde
x 97

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by to be chafoin » 19/10/19, 12:21

Did67 wrote:Autonomy is: you produce; you are all alone and therefore self-sufficient on your own ".

Independence is not depending - a balanced exchange, when you retain the ability to do, is a form of independence.
The meaning of words (etymologically) would lead me to understand the opposite!
0 x
Janic
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 19224
Registration: 29/10/10, 13:27
Location: bourgogne
x 3491

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by Janic » 19/10/19, 12:29

by drowning forum of text without tail or head, as in the subjects where he incenses charlatans responsible for the deaths of men by their misinformation.
and he says that without laughing! When there is a death of a man, the law is there to punish the misinformation or not. So instead of spreading fakenews, begin to harmonize your words and actions other than misinformation.
0 x
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
User avatar
Did67
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 20362
Registration: 20/01/08, 16:34
Location: Alsace
x 8685

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by Did67 » 19/10/19, 14:16

to be chafoin wrote:
Did67 wrote:Autonomy is: you produce; you are all alone and therefore self-sufficient on your own ".

Independence is not depending - a balanced exchange, when you retain the ability to do, is a form of independence.
The meaning of words (etymologically) would lead me to understand the opposite!


So, I do not know !!!!

For food issues, it is more the notion of "self-sufficiency" that is used.

I may have confused ...

Joker, so!

In any case, that's what I meant.
0 x
A.D. 44
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 640
Registration: 15/04/15, 15:32
Location: Home
x 225

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by A.D. 44 » 19/10/19, 15:13

Yeah...

Reduce and then compensate for its consumption ... It's already quite good, is not it?
0 x
sicetaitsimple
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9774
Registration: 31/10/16, 18:51
Location: Lower Normandy
x 2638

Re: non-closure of the Fessenheim plant, where is the scam of the negotiations?




by sicetaitsimple » 19/10/19, 15:30

AD 44 wrote:Reduce and then compensate for its consumption ... It's already quite good, is not it?


Except that with PV, we compensate in summer what is consumed in winter ..... It works well up to a certain threshold, but it necessarily has limits.

PS: Of course, I'm talking here about countries where winter consumption is higher than summer consumption, like France and Europe in general. It may be different elsewhere, especially in all countries where the need for heating is very low and where it is air conditioning. summer, which is the peak need.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 218 guests