300 liters, is more than the trunk of a Clio ... not to mention some insulation around ...lilian07 wrote:Finally the amount of water transported is not so important, it should optimize instead because instead of the trunk is still important / see condemn a back seat
400 liters, the trunk of a C3 or Megane.
400 kg more, it is also (and especially) a much higher consumption at each acceleration (so after every red light, roundabout ...)lilian07 wrote:I think the amount of energy lost by overweight is negligible ... one side we have E = mgh (potential energy for varying only in the case of mounted, if raids come help traction so if starting from a point a to return to point a and if additional support is neglected on the wheels you do not lose much ....)
In relief of cars calculations, considering that 30 kg less is the 0,1 / 100 consumption and less.
400 kg more, so this is the 1,3 / 100 more ... and a proportional brake wear, suspensions, tires ....
Yes, or less poetically 23 ... kWh equivalent to 2 liters of fuel.lilian07 wrote:another we 300l to 80 ° (exploiting 50 °) equivalent to a drop of 6000m vehicle mounted with a ton.
In the most common case for commuting - work, it will only work for the return trip, the water heated during outward having time to cool down during the workday.lilian07 wrote:In some habitat configuration I think it is simple to perform ....
When the solution to discharge water on each trip, that's for regions that do not lack water