I love Banania, but I don't have to be "
creationist"(
)
I don't want to take sides (with or without leaving an address). (
)
And I don't want to speak for him, but Le_Juste_Milieu doesn't seem to me to have a dogmatic opinion on this question, I don't know much about it. forum...!
Who is wrong and who is right, and when?
I would give just one example: the NDAs. Some 10 years ago, we would still have taxed those who speak of it as sweet dreamers, but today the phenomenon is studied scientifically. So if we had remained there confined in a logic of purely confrontation between "
pros" and "
anti»NDA, we would have stayed on a priori and nobody would have been interested in this subject, which we had been talking about discreetly for well fifty years, if not always (?)
Besides, if we want to look for the little beast: the "
Big Bang", You should tell us precisely what it is
Then, does cosmogony come from an intelligent design (or not)? I claim that it has nothing to do with this supposed zero point on the one hand, and that on the other hand the two trends can perfectly coexist:
- science as we know it in its most current form;
- the right to ask questions about the "why of life", of our existence and even to seek to find an understanding in all that ... There is nothing scandalous!
Therefore, there is no longer any reason to seek "who is right or wrong".
It is in any case the party that took a lot of secular European universities ...! Since they have in principle always had a university chair in ... theology!
Paste the label of "
creationist", to all goes, to those who" believe in God in the strict sense ", and you will see a whole bunch of new occult sects emerge! As if we did not already have enough em ... with the $ cientologue , the Order of the Solar Temple, or whatever ....
If among some of them there is dishonesty in the air (this is by far not the rule, and on the other hand, there are also scientists not very clear ... ) hamper their approach (and one or the other): continue this method which consists in banishing or rejecting, and you will only produce "
the draft»Which all occult circles need to recruit new flocks ...!
I prefer not to banish them, that they openly assume their convictions, it allows me to debate them openly in public with them (or without them, but this freedom exists ...) - and just like with scientists - to have an eye on what they do (or don't do ....) ...! Furthermore, for all those who are honest: freedom of belief is a fundamental right ...
Finally, it must be remembered that there was a time, it was the religious circles that chased scientists! For fear ... We still see in recent history what it gives!
Let us therefore leave the freedom of thought! And to think ...
(and we are not going to put Janic at the stake, as long as he has not yet made his thread on the "VG")
No, but! What is this witch hunt? !!! 
