I just invented the perpetual motion engine I think

[dedeleco]

Snapshoot is

not even done to understand

conservation of energy in all its forms and clearly he has never achieved anything in a practical way, even, a container, without leakage, just leaning against a wall, as he claims to do, to realize that all that 'he imagines it is impossible full of all kinds of losses, pressure, energy.

He is much more likely to look for the superconductor at ordinary temperature, to have a perpetual movement of electrons, than with his machine.

[snapshoot]

simplistic? why complicate things when you can make it simple and explain things pedagogically and in a fun way ...... and in addition, even by simplifying you did not understand anything, why complicate them therefore, you are already dropped and next of the plate as well.
as already said, my goal is not to convince you specially, I use this forum as an advertising platform to make my project known to the general public, that's it.

[Obamot]

What "humilityIn contempt!



And easy, as usual: that way you dodge and don't need to answer

Really the little classic denial!

[snapshoot]

Hello,

I read the entire document, trying to understand how it worked.

I just have a question.

page 14,

a gas under high pressure is injected into the cavity of part No. 4, the cavity being against the internal wall of part No. 3, therefore the gas under pressure will not run the risk of escaping.

So here we have a confined space from which a pressurized gas cannot escape.

Like a bottle of butane, right?
However, a bottle of butane does not move, although the pressure around it is much less? the only solution would be to let gas escape?

I don't have a lot of knowledge of physics, so I'm just trying to explain my question ...

thank you for your objective question

no, it's not like a butane bottle, but rather like the cylinder-piston couple of a car for example.
because parts 4 and 3 are not welded together!
the part 4 can slide against the round and internal face of the part 3.

at your service.

[Obamot]

[message deleted by the author, in view of the following response from Superform]

[Superform]

thank you for your objective question

no, it's not like a butane bottle, but rather like the cylinder-piston couple of a car for example.
because parts 4 and 3 are not welded together!
the part 4 can slide against the round and internal face of the part 3.

at your service.

Yes, but...

in a piston cylinder, the pressure is not constant, or in your system, yes?

[dedeleco]

it's not like a butane bottle, but rather like the cylinder-piston couple of a car for example.

and there you have to fill the piston under high pressure gas (combustion or compressed air), piston which when moving loses its pressure and its gas at the end and therefore you need a large flow of this gas, which provides its energy at high pressure .

It is impossible to have a perpetual movement without consuming anything, except at the quantum level, superfluids and superconductors at fairly low temperature, them without dissipation.

[plasmanu]

Being champion of stupid questions:

It's like a scroll compressor, without play, without friction without leakage.
Who compresses more gas than it consumes energy.
The outlet pressure turning the screw.
And so on.
He bin it is not won.

[snapshoot]

Yes, but...

in a piston cylinder, the pressure is not constant, or in your system, yes?

.... and it is better thus, better than to even decrease it, it is the aim sought elsewhere; fairly high and permanent pressure.

I already know the following question: where to get this pressure?
from an "inexhaustible" source that is the potential energy of gas, which we are therefore in the process of exploiting in another way (not in sauce; "what you lose in potential energy you gain in energy kinetic...").

[Obamot]

Le Môssieur kindly asks you if the pressure in your system is 'constant'!

so it's "YES"Or it is"NOT"!

(A constant pressure is not a permanent pressure: it can be constant permanently ...)