Act to improve our world

philosophical debates and companies.
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 16/04/12, 19:08

Christophe wrote:
elephant wrote:I have already proposed a collective suicide campaign
happiness interview, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jx0eecUpLHg#


Well, I found something to reconcile your words:

The foot, it would not be to consume with money which is not with oneself. : Cheesy:


Good ok I will .... make me see -> [] : Mrgreen: among the greeks
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 16/04/12, 19:30

There is a citation problem there, elephant did not participate in this subject ...
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 16/04/12, 20:08

sen-no-sen wrote: [...] After which it will be necessary to perform an act again in order to guarantee the satisfaction of the needs. [...]


We should do like A. Masslow: "have the lowest unmet needs ” ...>

Image

[Edit:] (damn it's too late, I can't edit anymore) : Mrgreen:

Christophe wrote:There is a citation problem there, elephant did not participate in this subject ...


That's good, Christophe and Obamot either!

Image

https://www.econologie.com/forums/post230495.html#230495

Image
0 x
vivelebonheur
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 5
Registration: 13/04/12, 21:33




by vivelebonheur » 26/04/12, 10:40

Hello,

Thank you very much for your very interesting answers.


Have you watched the movies? If yes, what do you think please?

Bonne journée.
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 26/04/12, 10:44

Yes looked and analyzed here in enough detail:

Christophe wrote: We have mentioned zetigest widely in this subject (among others):
https://www.econologie.com/forums/zeitgeist- ... t8934.html


I divided the subject from sen's response: https://www.econologie.com/forums/consommati ... 11758.html because it's been a long time since I wanted to talk about "consumption = satisfaction?"

ps: a variant with your nickname "vitelebonheur" would have been good too : Cheesy: : Idea:
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 26/04/12, 11:05

Obamot wrote:That's good, Christophe and Obamot either!

Image


Houla I had yet checked !!

Still there is a problem with the quote in your message because I had not mentioned it ...
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 26/04/12, 19:05

I could have removed the names of the authors of the quotes (but I didn't dare).

What I found interesting was the binary aspect of these two positions.

Funny that to "improve our world", we have to go from one extreme to another.

As has already been said:

if we are already not unhappy it is already not bad ...


The middle path, is it even a good stretch of road towards happiness?
0 x
vivelebonheur
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 5
Registration: 13/04/12, 21:33




by vivelebonheur » 10/05/12, 23:12

It is true that vitelebonheur is not bad too.

Especially for all the little Africans who will starve in the coming days not because of the resources available on Earth but because of the means to access them.

So yes, QUICKLY THE SYSTEM MUST CHANGE !!!
0 x

Back to "Society and Philosophy"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 264 guests