It is the title of article collection of testimonies published on the world: http://www.lemonde.fr/vous/article/2012 ... _3238.html
3 first testimonials ... the others on the link ...
* Sustainably resistant to development!, By Bernard
But what does such a survey mean? The French are certainly no more eco-skeptical than they were a few years ago. Unfortunately, they simply no longer have the means to translate their deep convictions into daily action. Can ecological-citizen acts, altruism, dedication to the cause of our planet take precedence over the need to move to work (further and further), to eat (at the lowest price), to to dress (economically), to find accommodation and heat? To survive? Three million unemployed and even more precarious. Let's not forget these numbers. I am, we are, they are, all intimately aware of the urgency to adopt an attitude "durably resistant to the frenzied development" in which our civilization is dragging us and to the disastrous consequences which will result from it. But the price to pay for voting "sustainable development" is for the majority of us more and more inaccessible.
* Too expensive, especially in times of crisis, by André
Wanting too much, relentlessly, "stuffing" people's heads with ecology and sustainable development, the reverse is happening: rejection! Between the ecology fanatics and the profiteers who charge you a high price for so-called green and organic products, consumers are doing their math. The conclusion: too expensive, especially in times of crisis! The ultimate impression: it has become a business that benefits some without being truly convinced of the veracity of the argument.
* A phenomenon of urban bobos, by François
Ecoloseptic does not mean ecolonegationist. I believe in the problems posed by pollution and the destruction of the environment. I expect results with more hindsight as to "climate change" which I believe is much less pronounced and anthropogenic than we are told. So that the urgency proclaimed to all winds seems dangerous to me: To cry "wolf" too quickly, we risk discrediting environmental concerns. But I am convinced that we can make very big savings, energy for example, without having to limit ourselves, especially when we do not already have much at the start. Our societies are incredibly wasteful among other things because they push us to consume more and more, devices become fragile by "programmed obsolescence", there is often more packaging than product, etc ... "Ecology" d 'today is a phenomenon of urban bobos and cathechumens who, for their part, do not lack purchasing power, work, housing, public services ... and often ignore what "nature" is. !
Sustainable development is still a little more than buying "green" products (fluorescent for some, see greenwashing), "clean" or "energy efficient" ... no?
