The killing of a human being is the first example for me:
Recently in the USA: (Troy Davis)
http://video.notrefamille.com/tv/intern ... 85398.html.
What is unforgivable in our societies (eg Troy Davis)
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4075
- Registration: 12/01/07, 08:18
- x 4
What is unforgivable in our societies (eg Troy Davis)
0 x
Man is by nature a political animal (Aristotle)
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
The debate on the death penalty for culprits is long, seen and already seen! In short it has been!
On the other hand, 1, in case of doubt about the guilt, having an innocent person killed should be punishable without prescription whatsoever if the investigation progresses! This is an interesting debate ...
On the other hand 2, that of the "killed by the economic society" ... there it is a current debate!
How many people die of hunger or thirst because of inequality alone?
How many killed at work in exploited countries?
How many people are killed by stress (productivity ...) in our western societies?
How many fossil or nuclear energy kills?
How many pollution kills?
More recently, how many suicides by the "capitalist system"?
Our CONS. Consumption societies do not only kill via the death penalty !!
Our societies silently kill innocent people every day and by the thousand in the name of capitalism alone!
The answer to most of these questions is about forum or the site, do a search: https://www.econologie.com/forums/search.php
On the other hand, 1, in case of doubt about the guilt, having an innocent person killed should be punishable without prescription whatsoever if the investigation progresses! This is an interesting debate ...
On the other hand 2, that of the "killed by the economic society" ... there it is a current debate!
How many people die of hunger or thirst because of inequality alone?
How many killed at work in exploited countries?
How many people are killed by stress (productivity ...) in our western societies?
How many fossil or nuclear energy kills?
How many pollution kills?
More recently, how many suicides by the "capitalist system"?
Our CONS. Consumption societies do not only kill via the death penalty !!
Our societies silently kill innocent people every day and by the thousand in the name of capitalism alone!
The answer to most of these questions is about forum or the site, do a search: https://www.econologie.com/forums/search.php
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Totally agree, but we are starting to become aware, to evaluate and to advance scientific figures, unlike in the past where we were practically not aware (working condition more than a century ago, which persists in countries in development, for our personal comfort with incredibly low prices !!)
By buying cheap Asian, we are all accomplices and exploiters, even criminals, by all these dead, who allow these low prices, dead who with us, would outraged us !!!!
By buying cheap Asian, we are all accomplices and exploiters, even criminals, by all these dead, who allow these low prices, dead who with us, would outraged us !!!!
0 x
- sen-no-sen
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6856
- Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
- Location: High Beaujolais.
- x 749
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Ahmed wrote:Our societies silently kill innocent people every day and by the thousands in the name of capitalism alone!
Others kill under the same conditions for other justifications ... is it better?
I don't know exactly what conditions you are referring to ...
My list was obviously not exhaustive but, for example, in the victims of fossil fuels, we can include resource wars ... obviously we rarely say publicly that it is for the money and the rich that we make the war but we invent some pretexts ...
Although wars have some figures, so we know the damage of capitalism ...
Humanity still has a lot to learn, if it gives itself time ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
sen-no-sen wrote:Natural selection is now (in part) replaced by economic structural selection ... simple logical evolution.
Yes except that selection in the capitalist sense of the term does not (necessarily) rhyme with selection at the genetic level ... Which means that there will be great danger for the survival (of humanity?) When the 1st weakens or will disappear ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- sen-no-sen
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6856
- Registration: 11/06/09, 13:08
- Location: High Beaujolais.
- x 749
Christophe wrote:Yes except that selection in the capitalist sense of the term does not (necessarily) rhyme with selection at the genetic level ... Which means that there will be great danger for the survival (of humanity?) When the 1st weakens or will disappear ...
Natural selection no longer really takes place these days, it is a proven fact but little recognized.
0 x
"Engineering is sometimes about knowing when to stop" Charles De Gaulle.
Christophe you wonder:
The conditions are as you indicate: in silence, every day ...
Rather, the right question would have been this: "for what other justifications?"
Ideological justifications, powers (dictatorships) ... all those which are not directly linked to the (considerable) power of the market.
Further you write:
Forgive me, but I do not understand absolutely nothing of this sentence. It is not rather: "when the latter weakens ..."?
I don't know exactly what conditions you are referring to ...
The conditions are as you indicate: in silence, every day ...
Rather, the right question would have been this: "for what other justifications?"
Ideological justifications, powers (dictatorships) ... all those which are not directly linked to the (considerable) power of the market.
Further you write:
Yes except that selection in the capitalist sense of the term does not (necessarily) rhyme with selection at the genetic level ... Which means that there will be great danger for the survival (of humanity?) When the 1st weakens or will disappear ...
Forgive me, but I do not understand absolutely nothing of this sentence. It is not rather: "when the latter weakens ..."?
0 x
"Please don't believe what I'm telling you."
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 16 Replies
- 2595 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
06/02/23, 08:40A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 5 Replies
- 4864 views
-
Last message by GuyGadeboisTheBack
View the latest post
11/03/21, 13:17A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 185 Replies
- 28572 views
-
Last message by GuyGadebois
View the latest post
08/11/19, 15:46A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 0 Replies
- 3091 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
27/04/17, 23:01A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 69 Replies
- 26765 views
-
Last message by Janic
View the latest post
07/07/18, 08:13A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 215 guests