indy49 wrote:Obamot wrote:indy49 wrote:[About Mélanchon]Christophe wrote:But for example: the factor 1 to 20 limit for wages
Weird that he doesn't want to do the same thing with heritages ...
Perhaps because he is the head of € 760 alone (http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Luc_M%C3%A9lenchon)
You blame Mélanchon for having a "heritage" is that it?
I reproach him for making him believe that he is on the side of the poor by taking the setting that suits him and making it happen.
But explain to me why he puts a limit on wages rather than on wealth?http://www.ifrap.org/Inegalites-le-veritable-montant-du-patrimoine-des-Francais,12246.html a écrit :354 euros, the heritage of the poorest 10% of French people "
=> Mélanchon should give more than 750 € to the poor (000 - 760 * 000).(note that I did not take the lowest wealth, which would be 0 €!)
If you had wanted to be "fair", you would have had to do the same with the other prominent candidates ...
You could have posted the entire text block that related to his income when you posted the link. Strangely, someone has since changed the text on Wikipedia! If you had been perceptive, you would have seen that he had voluntarily renounced his retirement as a senator and reduced by 25% other resources for the benefit of the community (or something). I am not a leftist, but I find it rather odious of such procedures which instrumentalize information supposed to bring credit to a candidate by using it in fact to lower him (am I not a model of fairness myself- even
).
I'm not saying it's voluntary on your part but the result is still odious.
