Tower on fire in Beijing: playing with fire is dangerous!

[coucou789456]

Hello

yet we have always been taught that playing with fire is dangerous, but obviously some have not yet learned the lesson.

to see the news, sorry future ex new TVCC TV tower among others, in China, whose construction had just been completed ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP50yddytzs

start around 20:22 p.m. at the top of the tower.
around 21:41 p.m., the whole tower was ablaze. at 23 p.m. there were no more flames, just smoke ... 20 a.m. for total destruction: the Chinese have just had their Titanic, the victims less.

amazing !!

to meditate.

jeff

[Remundo]

Purée

But their tower was full of fireworks or what: we hear them crackling even during the fire

[Remundo]

Le Monde talks about it:
http://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2 ... _3246.html

It's a miracle that the video is on youtube.

PS: tower of 160 m entirely ravaged by flames, with the start of fire at its summit. For hours: no collapse.

[Remundo]

It would seem that they are not the CCTV tower, but the Mandarin hotel which was under construction next door
http://www.rue89.com/chinatown/2009/02/ ... veau-pekin

[coucou789456]

Hello

according to the article in Le Monde, the TVCC tower was to house the management of TV channels and an auditorium, in addition to the Mandarin hotel. the other tower with a strange shape is the complement of the first which would be called CCTV.

moreover on some videos, the fireworks appear to be taken from a tower which is located behind because the explosions are partly hidden by the famous tower which burned.
however by reading the various articles, it emerges that the shooting of the fireworks was made from the tower which burned! obviously, whoever wrote the article didn't even watch the videos ...

to meditate also on the articles of journalists, on their accuracy, on their bias, etc ...

jeff

[Remundo]

Certainly ... in addition here, reliable information is surely very difficult to obtain.

Well, in any case what is certain is that they burnt a brand new tower by making fireworks. What to mitigate (for not very long) the sino-bluster.

[coucou789456]

re

more unlike the Twin Towers where the fire was circumscribed in the upper part of the buildings (which have completely collapsed (sic)), in the Chinese case, the fire spread to the lower parts of the building. it should be noted that one can reasonably ask the question on a possible fire-fighting when one notes according to the hour noted on the video that it apparently did not pass more than one hour and a half between the start, and the general conflagration.


a photo certainly taken shortly after the start where we see that the fire has certainly taken on the level of intermediate floor, certainly following the shots that came from opposite.

http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/2358774.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=0ZRYP5X5F6FSMBCCSE82&Expires=1234613663&Signature=WIGu1%2BDT6sDWaUeSz9yOPsiknM8%3D




jeff

[Christophe]

We do not understand well with only the 1st video, here are the results: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCz3B_jpkcg

It smacks of "conspiracy theory", September 11 made in China ...

+1 for the collapse but "the experts" will find an "excuse" ... You have to ask the "journalists" of (ala) rue89!

[Cuicui]

+1 for the collapse but "the experts" will find an "excuse" ... You have to ask the "journalists" of (ala) rue89!

It is however simple: you forgot to put the explosive charges.

[Christophe]

Explosives? What is that?

Unless (I posted on Youtube ... hiihihih):

Made In China Steel is much better quality than Made in USA Steel!

For anglophobes:

Chinese steel is really better than American steel!

What if it was a Chinese "whore" stunt to expose the 9/11 plot?

A few weeks after bush no longer has the "red button" ... a coincidence?